Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35337324›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2022

The impact of first wave of COVID-19 on the nursing-sensitive and rehabilitation outcomes of patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a single centre retrospective cohort study.

M Morri, E Ambrosi, D Raffa, R Raimondi, A Evangelista, A Mingazzini, C Forni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M MorriIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Servizio Di Assistenza Infermieristico Tecnico E Riabilitativo Bologna, Bologna, Italia. mattia.morri@ior.it.
E AmbrosiDipartimento Di Diagnostica E Sanità Pubblica, Università Degli Studi Di Verona, Verona, Italia.
D RaffaIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Servizio Di Assistenza Infermieristico Tecnico E Riabilitativo Bologna, Bologna, Italia.
R RaimondiLaboratorio Di Emodinamica, Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italia.
A EvangelistaIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Servizio Di Assistenza Infermieristico Tecnico E Riabilitativo Bologna, Bologna, Italia.
A MingazziniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Servizio Di Assistenza Infermieristico Tecnico E Riabilitativo Bologna, Bologna, Italia.
C ForniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Servizio Di Assistenza Infermieristico Tecnico E Riabilitativo Bologna, Bologna, Italia.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITOspedale Maggiore · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, the care of hip fracture patients remains a clinical priority. To date, there is limited empirical knowledge about the impact of pandemic on the care of patients surgically treated for hip fracture, affected or not by COVID-19.

objectiveTo investigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the nursing-sensitive and rehabilitation outcomes of frail patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted in an Italian Orthopaedic Research Institute. All patients aged ≥ 65 years admitted with fragility hip fractures between 1st March and 30th June in 2019 (group PP: pre-pandemic) and in the same period in 2020 (group P: pandemic), were compared. In the P group, COVID-19 positive patients were excluded due to the presence of a specific treatment pathway. Data on patient demographics and baseline characteristics, and peri-operative care factors were obtained from the Institute's computer-based patient-record system. The primary outcome was the incidence of any stage hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (PUs). The secondary outcome was time to first static verticalization and to first ambulation.

resultsThree-hundred and sixty patients were included in the study, which comprised 108 patients in PP group and 252 patients in P group. Overall PUs incidence was significantly higher in the P-group (21.8%) than in the PP-group (10.2%) (p = 0.009). Specifically, the incidence of sacral PUs was significantly lower in P-group (38.1%) vs PP-group (91%) (p = 0.004); on the contrary, the incidence of PUs localized to the heels or other body sites were significantly higher in P-group (30.9% and 30.9%, respectively) vs PP-group (0% and 9%, respectively) (p = 0.004). No significant between groups differences were found for all the secondary outcomes.

conclusionIn the pandemic period, nursing and rehabilitation care provided to patients with fragility hip fracture maintained high standards comparable to the pre-pandemic period. The increase in PUs incidence in the pandemic period was probably due to the older age of the patients admitted to hospital. The qualitative evaluation of the care administered and the emotional impact of the pandemic on the patients are very interesting topic which would deserve further investigation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hip fractureNursing-sensitive outcomeRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID35337324
PMCPMC8949825
OpenAlexW4220658856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.