Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35337320›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Body mass index and healthcare costs: using genetic variants from the HUNT study as instrumental variables.

Christina Hansen Edwards, Gunnhild Åberge Vie, Jonas Minet Kinge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christina Hansen EdwardsDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. christina.h.edwards@ntnu.no.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2329-1739
Gunnhild Åberge VieDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1552-5291
Jonas Minet KingeCentre for Fertility and Health & Centre for Disease Burden, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2789-6113
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPast studies have found associations between obesity and healthcare costs, however, these studies have suffered from bias due to omitted variables, reverse causality, and measurement error.

methodsWe used genetic variants related to body mass index (BMI) as instruments for BMI; thereby exploiting the natural randomization of genetic variants that occurs at conception. We used data on measured height and weight, genetic information, and sociodemographic factors from the Nord-Trøndelag Health Studies (HUNT), and individual-level registry data on healthcare costs, educational level, registration status, and biological relatives. We studied associations between BMI and general practitioner (GP)-, specialist-, and total healthcare costs in the Norwegian setting using instrumental variable (IV) regressions, and compared our findings with effect estimates from ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions. The sensitivity of our findings to underlying IV-assumptions was explored using two-sample Mendelian randomization methods, non-linear analyses, sex-, healthcare provider-, and age-specific analyses, within-family analyses, and outlier removal. We also conducted power calculations to assess the likelihood of detecting an effect given our sample 60,786 individuals.

resultsWe found that increased BMI resulted in significantly higher GP costs; however, the IV-based effect estimate was smaller than the OLS-based estimate. We found no evidence of an association between BMI and specialist or total healthcare costs.

conclusionsElevated BMI leads to higher GP costs, and more studies are needed to understand the causal mechanisms between BMI and specialist costs.

Indexed as

Mendelian Randomization AnalysisObesityBody Mass IndexHealth Care CostsHealth FacilitiesHumansBody mass indexCausationHealth care costsInstrumental variablesMendelian randomizationObesity

Identifiers

PMID35337320
PMCPMC8957125
OpenAlexW4220752328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.