Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35337315›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Identifying client characteristics to predict homecare use more accurately: a Delphi-study involving nurses and homecare purchasing specialists.

Anne O E van den Bulck, Arianne M J Elissen, Silke F Metzelthin, Maud H de Korte, Gertjan S Verhoeven, Teuntje A T de Witte-Breure, Lieuwe C van der Weij, Misja C Mikkers, Dirk Ruwaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The PET@home Toolkit: A Process Evaluation Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne O E van den BulckFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. a.vandenbulck@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Arianne M J ElissenFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Silke F MetzelthinFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maud H de KorteDepartment of Economics, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5037 AB, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Gertjan S VerhoevenDepartment of Economics, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5037 AB, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Teuntje A T de Witte-BreureDutch Healthcare Authority (NZa), P.O. Box 3017, 3502 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lieuwe C van der WeijDutch Healthcare Authority (NZa), P.O. Box 3017, 3502 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Misja C MikkersDepartment of Economics, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5037 AB, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Dirk RuwaardFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCase-mix based prospective payment of homecare is being implemented in several countries to work towards more efficient and client-centred homecare. However, existing models can only explain a limited part of variance in homecare use, due to their reliance on health- and function-related client data. It is unclear which predictors could improve predictive power of existing case-mix models. The aim of this study was therefore to identify relevant predictors of homecare use by utilizing the expertise of district nurses and health insurers.

methodsWe conducted a two-round Delphi-study according to the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. In the first round, participants assessed the relevance of eleven client characteristics that are commonly included in existing case-mix models for predicting homecare use, using a 9-Point Likert scale. Furthermore, participants were also allowed to suggest missing characteristics that they considered relevant. These items were grouped and a selection of the most relevant items was made. In the second round, after an expert panel meeting, participants re-assessed relevance of pre-existing characteristics that were assessed uncertain and of eleven suggested client characteristics. In both rounds, median and inter-quartile ranges were calculated to determine relevance.

resultsTwenty-two participants (16 district nurses and 6 insurers) suggested 53 unique client characteristics (grouped from 142 characteristics initially). In the second round, relevance of the client characteristics was assessed by 12 nurses and 5 health insurers. Of a total of 22 characteristics, 10 client characteristics were assessed as being relevant and 12 as uncertain. None was found irrelevant for predicting homecare use. Most of the client characteristics from the category 'Daily functioning' were assessed as uncertain. Client characteristics in other categories - i.e. 'Physical health status', 'Mental health status and behaviour', 'Health literacy', 'Social environment and network', and 'Other' - were more frequently considered relevant.

conclusionAccording to district nurses and health insurers, homecare use could be predicted better by including other more holistic predictors in case-mix classification, such as on mental functioning and social network. The challenge remains, however, to operationalize the new characteristics and keep stakeholders on board when developing and implementing case-mix classification for homecare prospective payment.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesHumansCasemixClassificationClient characteristicsHome care servicesPolicyProspective payment system

Identifiers

PMID35337315
PMCPMC8957197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.