Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35337306›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Randomized controlled trial of all-inside and standard single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with functional, MRI-based graft maturity and patient-reported outcome measures.

Rubing Lin, Qiuwen Zhong, Xiao Wu, Lei Cui, Rong Huang, Qianhua Deng, Jianwei Zuo, Changqing Jiang, Wei Li

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07023653 (Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between All-Inside and Complete Tibial Tunnel Techniques in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Patients With ACL Ruptures), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07023653 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between All-Inside and Complete Tibial Tunnel Techniques in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Patients With ACL Ruptures

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndonesia UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsAnterior Cruciate Ligament RuptureArmsAll-Inside Techniques, Complete Tibial Tunnel techniques
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rubing LinPeking University Shenzhen Hospital, Clinical College of Anhui Medical University, Lianhua Road 1120, Futian District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, 518036, People's Republic of China.
Qiuwen ZhongPeking University Shenzhen Hospital, Lianhua Road 1120, FuTian District, ShenZhen City, GuangDong Province, 518036, People's Republic of China.
Xiao WuPeking University Shenzhen Hospital, Lianhua Road 1120, FuTian District, ShenZhen City, GuangDong Province, 518036, People's Republic of China.
Lei CuiPeking University Shenzhen Hospital, Clinical College of Anhui Medical University, Lianhua Road 1120, Futian District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, 518036, People's Republic of China.
Rong HuangPeking University Shenzhen Hospital, Lianhua Road 1120, FuTian District, ShenZhen City, GuangDong Province, 518036, People's Republic of China.
Qianhua DengPeking University Shenzhen Hospital, Lianhua Road 1120, FuTian District, ShenZhen City, GuangDong Province, 518036, People's Republic of China.
Jianwei ZuoPeking University Shenzhen Hospital, Lianhua Road 1120, FuTian District, ShenZhen City, GuangDong Province, 518036, People's Republic of China.
Changqing JiangHuazhong University of Science and Technology Union Shenzhen Hospital, Taoyuan Road 89, Nanshan District, Shenzhen City, GuangDong Province, 518036, People's Republic of China.
Wei LiPeking University Shenzhen Hospital, Lianhua Road 1120, FuTian District, ShenZhen City, GuangDong Province, 518036, People's Republic of China. lwjnu2003@126.com.
Peking University Shenzhen Hospital · CNAnhui Medical University · CN

Funding

Shenzhen Health and Family Planning Commission SZLY2017004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAll-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a novel technique that has gained attention due to its minimally invasive and graft-saving properties. However, studies comparing MRI-based graft maturity between all-inside and standard ACLR are lacking. PURPOSE: This study focused on the functional, knee laxity, and MRI-based graft maturity characteristics of all-inside and standard single-bundle ACLR. STUDY

designRandomized controlled trial (RCT).

methodsFifty-four patients were randomly assigned to an all-inside reconstruction group (n = 27) or standard reconstruction group (n = 27). Using the same rehabilitation strategy. The Tegner, International Knee Documentation Committee, and Lysholm scores were recorded at postoperative months 3, 6, and 12 to assess functional recovery. MRI was conducted to measure the signal/noise quotient (SNQ) of the intra-articular graft to assess the maturity. A higher SNQ indicates lower graft maturity. Knee laxity was assessed using GNRB arthrometer at the postoperative month 12.

resultsThe graft SNQ of the all-inside group was significantly higher than that of the standard group at postoperative month 6 (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in graft SNQ between the two groups at postoperative months 3 and 12 (p > 0.05). Both groups exhibited the highest SNQ in the middle region of the graft, followed by the proximal region, and the distal region. Functional scores improved significantly for both groups and had no statistical difference (p > 0.05). The knee laxity was higher in the all-inside group (p < 0.05) at postoperative month 12. There was no correlation between the functional scores and graft maturity in both groups (p > 0.05).

conclusionsAll-inside and standard single-bundle ACLR show good functional outcomes; however, knee laxity was relatively higher in the all-inside ACLR group than in the standard ACLR group. Moreover, both techniques exhibited poor maturity in the middle graft region and the best in the distal region. Graft maturity with all-inside ACLR is inferior to that with standard ACLR in the early postoperative stages. There is no correlation between knee function and graft maturity.

trial registrationClinical trial registration numbers: ChiCTR1800018543 . Date of registration: 09/23/2018.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAll-insideAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionGraft maturityKnee laxitySingle-bundle

Identifiers

PMID35337306
PMCPMC8957124
OpenAlexW4220990830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.