Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35337296›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2022

Effect of surgical timing in 23-g pars plana vitrectomy for primary repair of macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, a retrospective study.

Omar Elghawy, Ryan Duong, Amen Nigussie, Joseph D Bogaard, James Patrie, Yevgeniy Shildkrot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Omar Elghawy *University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Ryan Duong *University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Amen NigussieUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Joseph D BogaardDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
James PatrieDepartment of Public Health Sciences, UVA, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Yevgeniy ShildkrotDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. ys8q@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is a common, potentially blinding ocular pathology that is considered a surgical emergency. Macular involvement has been identified as a major negative prognostic indicator for visual recovery after RRD correction. It is not currently clear whether early intervention improves visual outcomes, and in practice, there are potential disadvantages to performing early surgery for fovea-involving RRD. Such disadvantages include inadequate assessment of coexisting comorbidities, increased rate of complications related to poorly trained staff or tired surgeons, and anesthetic risk.

methodsA single-center, retrospective, cohort study of patients who underwent repair of macula-involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachment at the University of Virginia was performed. Variables collected included patient demographics, ocular history, clinical characteristics, and post-operative complications. Patients were excluded if they had a history of congenital or acquired pathology with an effect on visual function, bilateral or repeat rhegmatogenous detachment, age less than 18 years, follow up duration less than 6 months, or if they were repaired using scleral buckle, pneumatic retinopexy, 25- or 27-gauge pars plana vitrectomy, or any combination of these techniques. A multivariate regression model was used to compare overall outcomes such as post-operative visual acuity, intra-ocular pressure, retina attachment status, and complications among patients of differing timing of surgical repair. These analyses were adjusted for clinical factors known or considered to be associated with worse prognosis in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

resultsA total of 104 patients undergoing 23-gauge vitrectomy for repair of macula involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachments were included in this study with mean follow up period 17.9 ± 14.1 months. Early surgical repair (< 48 h) was pursued in 26 patients, moderately delayed surgical repair (3-7 days), was performed in 29 patients and late surgical repair (> 7 days) in 49 patients. Our analysis showed no difference in post-operative visual acuity between patients with detachments undergoing early versus moderately delayed repair of RRD. However, mean visual acuity differed between patients undergoing early versus late repair at 3, 6, and 12 months. No significant difference was observed in post-operative complications between the three surgical timepoints including cataract formation, development of glaucoma and re-detachment rate. Use of 360 laser was found to be protective against re-detachment overall (OR 6.70 95% CI 1.93-23.2).

conclusionsThese findings indicate that a moderate delay of 3-7 days from symptom onset for repair of macula-involving retinal detachment may be a safe approach as there are no differences in terms of visual acuity or post-operative complications compared to early repair within 48 h. Delaying surgery for > 7 days however is not recommended due to the loss of recovery of visual acuity observed in this study. Use of 360 laser may prevent risk of re-detachment after primary repair.

Indexed as

Macula LuteaRetinal DetachmentAdolescentCohort StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesVitrectomyComplicationsDurationMacula-offPars plana vitrectomyRhegmatogenous retinal detachmentVisual outcomes

Identifiers

PMID35337296
PMCPMC8957134
OpenAlexW4221128918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.