Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35337121›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Traditional and Computational Screening of Non-Toxic Peptides and Approaches to Improving Selectivity.

Alberto A Robles-Loaiza, Edgar A Pinos-Tamayo, Bruno Mendes, Josselyn A Ortega-Pila, Carolina Proaño-Bolaños, Fabien Plisson, Cátia Teixeira, Paula Gomes, José R Almeida

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Pep5-Cpp, a Cyclin D2-Derived Antimicrobial.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alberto A Robles-LoaizaBiomolecules Discovery Group, Universidad Regional Amazónica Ikiam, Tena 150150, Ecuador.
Edgar A Pinos-TamayoEscuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL, Centro Nacional de Acuicultura e Investigaciones Marinas (CENAIM), Campus Gustavo Galindo Km. 30, 5 Vía Perimetral, Guayaquil 09-01-5863, Ecuador.
Bruno MendesBiomolecules Discovery Group, Universidad Regional Amazónica Ikiam, Tena 150150, Ecuador.
Josselyn A Ortega-PilaBiomolecules Discovery Group, Universidad Regional Amazónica Ikiam, Tena 150150, Ecuador.
Carolina Proaño-BolañosBiomolecules Discovery Group, Universidad Regional Amazónica Ikiam, Tena 150150, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0001-9279-1038
Fabien PlissonConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Unidad de Genómica Avanzada, Laboratorio Nacional de Genómica para la Biodiversidad (Langebio), Centro de Investigación Y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, Irapuato 36824, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2246-9347
Cátia TeixeiraLaboratório Associado para a Química Verde-REQUIMTE, Departamento de Química e Bioquímica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9506-3781
Paula GomesLaboratório Associado para a Química Verde-REQUIMTE, Departamento de Química e Bioquímica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6018-4724
José R AlmeidaBiomolecules Discovery Group, Universidad Regional Amazónica Ikiam, Tena 150150, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-4637-4468
Universidad Regional Amazónica IKIAM · ECUniversidade do Porto · PTEscuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral · ECSecretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptides have positively impacted the pharmaceutical industry as drugs, biomarkers, or diagnostic tools of high therapeutic value. However, only a handful have progressed to the market. Toxicity is one of the main obstacles to translating peptides into clinics. Hemolysis or hemotoxicity, the principal source of toxicity, is a natural or disease-induced event leading to the death of vital red blood cells. Initial screenings for toxicity have been widely evaluated using erythrocytes as the gold standard. More recently, many online databases filled with peptide sequences and their biological meta-data have paved the way toward hemolysis prediction using user-friendly, fast-access machine learning-driven programs. This review details the growing contributions of in silico approaches developed in the last decade for the large-scale prediction of erythrocyte lysis induced by peptides. After an overview of the pharmaceutical landscape of peptide therapeutics, we highlighted the relevance of early hemolysis studies in drug development. We emphasized the computational models and algorithms used to this end in light of historical and recent findings in this promising field. We benchmarked seven predictors using peptides from different data sets, having 7-35 amino acids in length. According to our predictions, the models have scored an accuracy over 50.42% and a minimal Matthew's correlation coefficient over 0.11. The maximum values for these statistical parameters achieved 100.0% and 1.00, respectively. Finally, strategies for optimizing peptide selectivity were described, as well as prospects for future investigations. The development of in silico predictive approaches to peptide toxicity has just started, but their important contributions clearly demonstrate their potential for peptide science and computer-aided drug design. Methodology refinement and increasing use will motivate the timely and accurate in silico identification of selective, non-toxic peptide therapeutics.

Indexed as

hemolysisin silicomachine learningpeptidestoxicity

Identifiers

PMID35337121
PMCPMC8953747
OpenAlexW4220912136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.