ArticleBiology2022
Boron Delivery to Brain Cells via Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Circulation for BNCT in a Rat Melanoma Model.
Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical application of boron neutron capture therapy for cancer treatment: A systematic review.Precision radiation oncology · 2025Review
- Boron neutron capture therapy in the context of tumor heterogeneity: progress, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Article
- Amino Acid-Based Boron Carriers in Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT).Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Article
- Boron Delivery to Brain Cells via Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Circulation in BNCT of Brain-Tumor-Model Rats-Ex Vivo Imaging of BPA Using MALDI Mass Spectrometry Imaging.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization (MALDI) Mass Spectrometry Imaging of L-4-Phenylalanineboronic Acid (BPA) in a Brain Tumor Model Rat for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT).Mass spectrometry (Tokyo, Japan) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, exploitation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation has become increasingly recognized as a feasible strategy to solve the challenges involved in drug delivery for treating brain tumors. Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) also faces challenges associated with the development of an efficient delivery system for boron, especially to brain tumors. Our laboratory has been developing a system for boron delivery to brain cells using CSF, which we call the "boron CSF administration method". In our previous study, we found that boron was efficiently delivered to the brain cells of normal rats in the form of small amounts of L-p-boronophenylalanine (BPA) using the CSF administration method. In the study described here, we carried out experiments with brain tumor model rats to demonstrate the usefulness of the CSF administration method for BNCT. We first investigated the boron concentration of the brain cells every 60 min after BPA administration into the lateral ventricle of normal rats. Second, we measured and compared the boron concentration in the melanoma model rats after administering boron via either the CSF administration method or the intravenous (IV) administration method, with estimation of the T/N ratio. Our results revealed that boron injected by the CSF administration method was excreted quickly from normal cells, resulting in a high T/N ratio compared to that of IV administration. In addition, the CSF administration method resulted in high boron accumulation in tumor cells. In conclusion, we found that using our developed CSF administration method results in more selective delivery of boron to the brain tumor compared with the IV administration method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.