Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35336707›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Do Genetic Drift and Gene Flow Affect the Geographic Distribution of Female Plants in Gynodioecious

Hannah J Appiah-Madson, Eric B Knox, Christina M Caruso, Andrea L Case

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannah J Appiah-MadsonDepartment of Marine and Environmental Science, Ocean Genome Legacy Center, Northeastern University, Nahant, MA 01908, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8408-7729
Eric B KnoxDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Christina M CarusoDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7069-9572
Andrea L CaseDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44240, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation DEB-0074354National Science Foundation DEB-0842280NIH HHS RO1-GM-76012United States Department of Energy CSP06-SE05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variation in population sex ratio is particularly pronounced in gynodioecious angiosperms. Extremely high female frequencies in gynodioecious populations cannot be readily explained by selective forces alone. To assess the contributions of drift and gene flow to extreme sex-ratio variation, we documented sex ratio and population size in 92 populations of Lobelia siphilitica across its range and genotyped plants using plastid and nuclear genetic markers. Similarity in spatial patterns of genetic and demographic variables may suggest that drift and/or gene flow have contributed to population sex-ratio variation in L. siphilitica. We found strong spatial structuring of extremely high female frequencies: populations with >50% female plants are restricted to the south−central portion of the range. However, we did not detect any spatial structuring in population size nor metrics of genetic diversity, suggesting that extreme variation in female frequency is not strongly affected by drift or gene flow. Extreme sex-ratio variation is frequently observed in gynodioecious plants, but its causes are difficult to identify. Further investigation into mechanisms that create or maintain the spatial structure of sex ratios in gynodioecious species will provide much needed insight.

Indexed as

gene flowgenetic driftgeographic structuregynodioecyLobelia siphiliticanon-selective mechanismssex ratio

Identifiers

PMID35336707
PMCPMC8950786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.