Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35336551›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Threats Detection during Human-Computer Interaction in Driver Monitoring Systems.

Alexey Kashevnik, Andrew Ponomarev, Nikolay Shilov, Andrey Chechulin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. In-Cabin Monitoring System for Autonomous Vehicles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexey KashevnikSt. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SPC RAS), St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 199178 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6503-1447
Andrew PonomarevSt. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SPC RAS), St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 199178 St. Petersburg, Russia.
Nikolay ShilovSt. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SPC RAS), St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 199178 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9264-9127
Andrey ChechulinSt. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SPC RAS), St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 199178 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7056-6972

Funding

Russian Foundation for Basic Research 19-29-06099Russian State Research FFZF-2022-0005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents an approach and a case study for threat detection during human-computer interaction, using the example of driver-vehicle interaction. We analyzed a driver monitoring system and identified two types of users: the driver and the operator. The proposed approach detects possible threats for the driver. We present a method for threat detection during human-system interactions that generalizes potential threats, as well as approaches for their detection. The originality of the method is that we frame the problem of threat detection in a holistic way: we build on the driver-ITS system analysis and generalize existing methods for driver state analysis into a threat detection method covering the identified threats. The developed reference model of the operator-computer interaction interface shows how the driver monitoring process is organized, and what information can be processed automatically, and what information related to the driver behavior has to be processed manually. In addition, the interface reference model includes mechanisms for operator behavior monitoring. We present experiments that included 14 drivers, as a case study. The experiments illustrated how the operator monitors and processes the information from the driver monitoring system. Based on the case study, we clarified that when the driver monitoring system detected the threats in the cabin and notified drivers about them, the number of threats was significantly decreased.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingComputersHumansintelligent transportation systemssmartphone sensorsthreats detection

Identifiers

PMID35336551
PMCPMC8949224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.