Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35336534›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Acoustic Environmental Conditions (Do Not?) Affect the Static Posturography Diagnostic Accuracy: A Test-Retest Reliability Study.

Sofía Olivia Calvo-Moreno, Elena Sonsoles Rodríguez-López, Umut Varol, María Benito-de-Pedro, Elena Anós-Merino, Orlando Conde-Vázquez, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, Juan Antonio Valera-Calero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sofía Olivia Calvo-MorenoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, Universidad Camilo José Cela, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28692 Madrid, Spain.
Elena Sonsoles Rodríguez-LópezDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, Universidad Camilo José Cela, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28692 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4289-9299
Umut VarolVALTRADOFI Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, Universidad Camilo José Cela, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28692 Madrid, Spain.
María Benito-de-PedroDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, Universidad Camilo José Cela, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28692 Madrid, Spain.
Elena Anós-MerinoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, Universidad Camilo José Cela, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28692 Madrid, Spain.
Orlando Conde-VázquezDepartamento de Biología Funcional y Ciencias de la Salud, Facultad de Fisioterapia, Universidad de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8862-2215
César Fernández-de-Las-PeñasDepartment of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, 28933 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3772-9690
Juan Antonio Valera-CaleroDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health, Universidad Camilo José Cela, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28692 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3379-8392

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Static posturography assessed with force platforms is a procedure used to obtain objective estimates related to postural adjustments. However, controlling multiple intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy is essential to obtain reliable measurements and recommend its use with clinical or research purposes. We aimed to analyze how different environmental acoustic conditions affect the test−retest reliability and to analyze the most appropriate number of trials to calculate a valid mean average score. A diagnostic accuracy study was conducted enrolling 27 healthy volunteers. All procedures were taken considering consistent device settings, posture, feet position, recording time, and illumination of the room. Three trials were recorded in a silent environment (35−40 dB) and three trials were recorded in a noisy environment (85−90 dB). Results showed comparable reliability estimates for both acoustic conditions (ICC = 0.453−0.962 and 0.621−0.952), but silent conditions demonstrated better sensitivity to changes (MDC = 13.6−76%). Mean average calculations from 2 and 3 trials showed no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05). Cross-sectional studies can be conducted under noisy or silent conditions as no significantly different scores were obtained (p > 0.05) and ICC were comparable (except oscillation area). However, longitudinal studies should consider silent conditions as they demonstrated better sensitivity to real changes not derived from measurement errors.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesPostureAcousticsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansReproducibility of Resultsdiagnostic accuracyenvironmentnoisepostural balancereliabilitystabilometry

Identifiers

PMID35336534
PMCPMC8956081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.