Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35336529›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

How Validation Methodology Influences Human Activity Recognition Mobile Systems.

Hendrio Bragança, Juan G Colonna, Horácio A B F Oliveira, Eduardo Souto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hendrio BragançaInstitute of Computing, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus 69067-005, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1479-1707
Juan G ColonnaInstitute of Computing, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus 69067-005, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1740-2618
Horácio A B F OliveiraInstitute of Computing, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus 69067-005, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9777-3947
Eduardo SoutoInstitute of Computing, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus 69067-005, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0003-908X

Funding

Samsung Electronics of Amazonia Ltda 003/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we introduce explainable methods to understand how Human Activity Recognition (HAR) mobile systems perform based on the chosen validation strategies. Our results introduce a new way to discover potential bias problems that overestimate the prediction accuracy of an algorithm because of the inappropriate choice of validation methodology. We show how the SHAP (Shapley additive explanations) framework, used in literature to explain the predictions of any machine learning model, presents itself as a tool that can provide graphical insights into how human activity recognition models achieve their results. Now it is possible to analyze which features are important to a HAR system in each validation methodology in a simplified way. We not only demonstrate that the validation procedure

Indexed as

Human ActivitiesMachine LearningAlgorithmsHumansexplainable methodshuman activity recognitionleave-one-subject-out cross-validationmachine learningShapley additive explanationsvalidation methodology

Identifiers

PMID35336529
PMCPMC8954513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.