Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35336517›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Automated Feature Extraction on AsMap for Emotion Classification Using EEG.

Md Zaved Iqubal Ahmed, Nidul Sinha, Souvik Phadikar, Ebrahim Ghaderpour

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Effect of Dual-Task Training on the Number of EEG Bands in Stroke Patients.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2025
    Article
  3. Temporal Relation Modeling and Multimodal Adversarial Alignment Network for Pilot Workload Evaluation.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Md Zaved Iqubal AhmedDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Silchar 788010, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8416-5819
Nidul SinhaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Silchar 788010, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0410-2154
Souvik PhadikarDepartment of Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Silchar 788010, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7122-2095
Ebrahim GhaderpourDepartment of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5165-1773
National Institute Of Technology Silchar · INUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotion recognition using EEG has been widely studied to address the challenges associated with affective computing. Using manual feature extraction methods on EEG signals results in sub-optimal performance by the learning models. With the advancements in deep learning as a tool for automated feature engineering, in this work, a hybrid of manual and automatic feature extraction methods has been proposed. The asymmetry in different brain regions is captured in a 2D vector, termed the AsMap, from the differential entropy features of EEG signals. These AsMaps are then used to extract features automatically using a convolutional neural network model. The proposed feature extraction method has been compared with differential entropy and other feature extraction methods such as relative asymmetry, differential asymmetry and differential caudality. Experiments are conducted using the SJTU emotion EEG dataset and the DEAP dataset on different classification problems based on the number of classes. Results obtained indicate that the proposed method of feature extraction results in higher classification accuracy, outperforming the other feature extraction methods. The highest classification accuracy of 97.10% is achieved on a three-class classification problem using the SJTU emotion EEG dataset. Further, this work has also assessed the impact of window size on classification accuracy.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEmotionsBrainEntropyNeural Networks, Computerarousalclassificationdeep learningelectroencephalogramemotionvalence

Identifiers

PMID35336517
PMCPMC8955420
OpenAlexW4220842428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.