Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35336510›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

High Specificity of Single Inertial Sensor-Supplemented Timed Up and Go Test for Assessing Fall Risk in Elderly Nursing Home Residents.

Frédéric Dierick, Pierre-Loup Stoffel, Gaston Schütz, Fabien Buisseret

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fall Risk Management in Nursing Homes: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Wearable Sensors Applied in Movement Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Frédéric DierickLaboratoire d'Analyse du Mouvement et de la Posture (LAMP), Centre National de Rééducation Fonctionnelle et de Réadaptation-Rehazenter, Rue André Vésale 1, 2674 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0003-2061-0968
Pierre-Loup StoffelForme and Fonctionnement Humain Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Haute Ecole Louvain en Hainaut, Rue Trieu Kaisin 136, 6061 Montignies-sur-Sambre, Belgium.
Gaston SchützCentre National de Rééducation Fonctionnelle et de Réadaptation-Rehazenter, Rue André Vésale 1, 2674 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Fabien BuisseretCeREF-Technique, Chaussée de Binche 159, 7000 Mons, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7801-036X
Haute École Louvain en Hainaut · BEUCLouvain · BEUniversity of Mons · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Timed Up and Go test (TUG) is commonly used to estimate the fall risk in the elderly. Several ways to improve the predictive accuracy of TUG (cameras, multiple sensors, other clinical tests) have already been proposed. Here, we added a single wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU) to capture the residents' body center-of-mass kinematics in view of improving TUG's predictive accuracy. The aim is to find out which kinematic variables and residents' characteristics are relevant for distinguishing faller from non-faller patients. Data were collected in 73 nursing home residents with the IMU placed on the lower back. Acceleration and angular velocity time series were analyzed during different subtasks of the TUG. Multiple logistic regressions showed that total time required, maximum angular velocity at the first half-turn, gender, and use of a walking aid were the parameters leading to the best predictive abilities of fall risk. The predictive accuracy of the proposed new test, called i + TUG, reached a value of 74.0%, with a specificity of 95.9% and a sensitivity of 29.2%. By adding a single wearable IMU to TUG, an accurate and highly specific test is therefore obtained. This method is quick, easy to perform and inexpensive. We recommend to integrate it into daily clinical practice in nursing homes.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningPostural BalanceAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansNursing HomesTime and Motion Studieselderlyfall riskinertial sensorkinematicslogistic regressionTUG

Identifiers

PMID35336510
PMCPMC8950330
OpenAlexW4221110099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.