ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
An Atlas for the Inkjet Printing of Large-Area Tactile Sensors.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D Printing Assisted Wearable and Implantable Biosensors.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Recent Advances in Tactile Sensory Systems: Mechanisms, Fabrication, and Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Tactile-Sensing Technologies: Trends, Challenges and Outlook in Agri-Food Manipulation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A Review of Epidermal Flexible Pressure Sensing Arrays.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Learning-based robotic grasping: A review.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023Review
- A Comprehensive Review on Printed Electronics: A Technology Drift towards a Sustainable Future.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- MEMS-Based Tactile Sensors: Materials, Processes and Applications in Robotics.Micromachines · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to discuss the inkjet printing technique as a fabrication method for the development of large-area tactile sensors. The paper focuses on the manufacturing techniques and various system-level sensor design aspects related to the inkjet manufacturing processes. The goal is to assess how printed electronics simplify the fabrication process of tactile sensors with respect to conventional fabrication methods and how these contribute to overcoming the difficulties arising in the development of tactile sensors for real robot applications. To this aim, a comparative analysis among different inkjet printing technologies and processes is performed, including a quantitative analysis of the design parameters, such as the costs, processing times, sensor layout, and general system-level constraints. The goal of the survey is to provide a complete map of the state of the art of inkjet printing, focusing on the most effective topics for the implementation of large-area tactile sensors and a view of the most relevant open problems that should be addressed to improve the effectiveness of these processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.