Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35336377›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Tool Condition Monitoring for High-Performance Machining Systems-A Review.

Ayman Mohamed, Mahmoud Hassan, Rachid M'Saoubi, Helmi Attia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ayman MohamedDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9785-4931
Mahmoud HassanAdvanced Material Removal Processes, Aerospace Manufacturing Technologies Center (AMTC), National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6881-3882
Rachid M'SaoubiR&D Material and Technology Development, Seco Tools AB, SE-73782 Fagersta, Sweden.
Helmi AttiaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0C3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4705-5311

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of the "Industry 4.0" revolution, self-adjusting and unmanned machining systems have gained considerable interest in high-value manufacturing industries to cope with the growing demand for high productivity, standardized part quality, and reduced cost. Tool condition monitoring (TCM) systems pave the way for automated machining through monitoring the state of the cutting tool, including the occurrences of wear, cracks, chipping, and breakage, with the aim of improving the efficiency and economics of the machining process. This article reviews the state-of-the-art TCM system components, namely, means of sensing, data acquisition, signal conditioning and processing, and monitoring models, found in the recent open literature. Special attention is given to analyzing the advantages and limitations of current practices in developing wireless tool-embedded sensor nodes, which enable seamless implementation and Industrial Internet of Things (IIOT) readiness of TCM systems. Additionally, a comprehensive review of the selection of dimensionality reduction techniques is provided due to the lack of clear recommendations and shortcomings of various techniques developed in the literature. Recent attempts for TCM systems' generalization and enhancement are discussed, along with recommendations for possible future research avenues to improve TCM systems accuracy, reliability, functionality, and integration.

Indexed as

Equipment and Suppliesfeature extractionmachine learningmilling processsensor fusionsignal processingtool condition monitoring

Identifiers

PMID35336377
PMCPMC8950983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.