Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35336374›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Validity and Reliability of the Insole3 Instrumented Shoe Insole for Ground Reaction Force Measurement during Walking and Running.

Leora A Cramer, Markus A Wimmer, Philip Malloy, Joan A O'Keefe, Christopher B Knowlton, Christopher Ferrigno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leora A CramerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison Street, Suite 201, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Markus A WimmerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison Street, Suite 201, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6169-3873
Philip MalloyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison Street, Suite 201, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Joan A O'KeefeDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Rush University Medical Center, 600 S. Paulina St., Suite 507, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Christopher B KnowltonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison Street, Suite 201, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Christopher FerrignoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison Street, Suite 201, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Rush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pressure-detecting insoles such as the Insole3 have potential as a portable alternative for assessing vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) outside of specialized laboratories. This study evaluated whether the Insole3 is a valid and reliable alternative to force plates for measuring vGRF. Eleven healthy participants walked overground at slow and moderately paced speeds and ran at a moderate pace while collecting vGRF simultaneously from a force plate (3000 Hz) and Insole3 (100 Hz). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) demonstrated excellent vGRF agreement between systems during both walking speeds for Peak 1, Peak 2, the valley between peaks, and the vGRF impulse (ICC > 0.941). There was excellent agreement during running for the single vGRF peak (ICC = 0.942) and impulse (ICC = 0.940). The insoles slightly underestimated vGRF peaks (−3.7% to 0.9% bias) and valleys (−2.2% to −1.8% bias), and slightly overestimated impulses (4.2% to 5.6% bias). Reliability between visits for all three activities was excellent (ICC > 0.970). The Insole3 is a valid and reliable alternative to traditional force plates for assessing vGRF during walking and running in healthy adults. The excellent ICC values during slow walking suggests that the Insole3 may be particularly suitable for older adults in clinical and home settings.

Indexed as

ShoesWalkingAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMechanical PhenomenaReproducibility of Resultsgait mechanicsground reaction forcepressure insolereliabilityvalidation

Identifiers

PMID35336374
PMCPMC8951440
OpenAlexW4220668373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.