Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35336373›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Leveraging Computational Intelligence Techniques for Defensive Deception: A Review, Recent Advances, Open Problems and Future Directions.

Pilla Vaishno Mohan, Shriniket Dixit, Amogh Gyaneshwar, Utkarsh Chadha, Kathiravan Srinivasan, Jung Taek Seo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pilla Vaishno MohanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore 632014, India.
Shriniket DixitSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore 632014, India.
Amogh GyaneshwarSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6656-0321
Utkarsh ChadhaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5044-3761
Kathiravan SrinivasanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9352-0237
Jung Taek SeoDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0971-8548

Funding

Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion 20210004930012005National Research Foundation of Korea 2020R1A2C101218712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With information systems worldwide being attacked daily, analogies from traditional warfare are apt, and deception tactics have historically proven effective as both a strategy and a technique for Defense. Defensive Deception includes thinking like an attacker and determining the best strategy to counter common attack strategies. Defensive Deception tactics are beneficial at introducing uncertainty for adversaries, increasing their learning costs, and, as a result, lowering the likelihood of successful attacks. In cybersecurity, honeypots and honeytokens and camouflaging and moving target defense commonly employ Defensive Deception tactics. For a variety of purposes, deceptive and anti-deceptive technologies have been created. However, there is a critical need for a broad, comprehensive and quantitative framework that can help us deploy advanced deception technologies. Computational intelligence provides an appropriate set of tools for creating advanced deception frameworks. Computational intelligence comprises two significant families of artificial intelligence technologies: deep learning and machine learning. These strategies can be used in various situations in Defensive Deception technologies. This survey focuses on Defensive Deception tactics deployed using the help of deep learning and machine learning algorithms. Prior work has yielded insights, lessons, and limitations presented in this study. It culminates with a discussion about future directions, which helps address the important gaps in present Defensive Deception research.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningAlgorithmsDeceptioncomputational intelligencedeep learningdefensive deceptionhoneypotsmachine-learningmoving target defense

Identifiers

PMID35336373
PMCPMC8952217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.