ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Assessing Respiratory Activity by Using IMUs: Modeling and Validation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Augmented Reality in Vocal Technique Training: Interactive Visualizations of Breath and Posture Control Using Magic Keys AR.Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback · 2026Article
- Sensor Selection for Tidal Volume Determination via Linear Regression-Impact of Lasso versus Ridge Regression.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Characterisation and Quantification of Upper Body Surface Motions for Tidal Volume Determination in Lung-Healthy Individuals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Changes in Forcecardiography Heartbeat Morphology Induced by Cardio-Respiratory Interactions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to explore novel inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based strategies to estimate respiratory parameters in healthy adults lying on a bed while breathing normally. During the experimental sessions, the kinematics of the chest wall were contemporaneously collected through both a network of 9 IMUs and a set of 45 uniformly distributed reflective markers. All inertial kinematics were analyzed to identify a minimum set of signals and IMUs whose linear combination best matched the tidal volume measured by optoelectronic plethysmography. The resulting models were finally tuned and validated through a leave-one-out cross-validation approach to assess the extent to which they could accurately estimate a set of respiratory parameters related to three trunk compartments. The adopted methodological approach allowed us to identify two different models. The first, referred to as Model 1, relies on the 3D acceleration measured by three IMUs located on the abdominal compartment and on the lower costal margin. The second, referred to as Model 2, relies on only one component of the acceleration measured by two IMUs located on the abdominal compartment. Both models can accurately estimate the respiratory rate (relative error < 1.5%). Conversely, the duration of the respiratory phases and the tidal volume can be more accurately assessed by Model 2 (relative error < 5%) and Model 1 (relative error < 5%), respectively. We further discuss possible approaches to overcome limitations and improve the overall accuracy of the proposed approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.