Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35336348›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Combined Use of Cointegration Analysis and Robust Outlier Statistics to Improve Damage Detection in Real-World Structures.

Simone Turrisi, Emanuele Zappa, Alfredo Cigada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simone TurrisiPolitecnico di Milano, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Via La Masa 1, 20156 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2034-6960
Emanuele ZappaPolitecnico di Milano, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Via La Masa 1, 20156 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3320-9030
Alfredo CigadaPolitecnico di Milano, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Via La Masa 1, 20156 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6861-8374
Politecnico di Milano · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the need for controlling many ageing and complex structures, structural health monitoring (SHM) has become increasingly common over the past few decades. However, one of the main limitations for the implementation of continuous monitoring systems in real-world structures is the effect that benign influences, such as environmental and operational variations (EOVs), have on damage sensitive features. These fluctuations may mask malign changes caused by structural damages, resulting in false structural condition assessment. When damage identification is implemented as novelty detection due to the lack of known damage states, outliers may be part of the data set as the result of the benign and malign factors mentioned above. Thanks to the developments in the field of robust outlier detection, the current paper presents a new data fusion method based on the use of cointegration and minimum covariance determinant estimator (MCD), which allows us to visualize and to classify outliers in SHM data, depending on their origin. To validate the effectiveness of this technique, the recent case study of the KW51 bridge has been considered, whose natural frequencies are subjected to variations due to both EOVs and a real structural change.

Indexed as

acceleration signalscointegrationenvironmental and operational variationsnatural frequenciesnovelty detectionrobust outlier analysissensor data fusionstructural health monitoring

Identifiers

PMID35336348
PMCPMC8951332
OpenAlexW4220762821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.