ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Shedding Light on Capillary-Based Backscattering Interferometry.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measuring the refractive index and sub-nanometre surface functionalisation of nanoparticles in suspension.Nanoscale · 2022Article
- An Analysis of Semicircular Channel Backscattering Interferometry through Ray Tracing Simulations.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Capillary-based backscattering interferometry has been used extensively as a tool to measure molecular binding via interferometric refractive index sensing. Previous studies have analysed the fringe patterns created in the backscatter direction. However, polarisation effects, spatial chirps in the fringe pattern and the practical impact of various approximations, and assumptions in existing models are yet to be fully explored. Here, two independent ray tracing approaches are applied, analysed, contrasted, compared to experimental data, and improved upon by introducing explicit polarisation dependence. In doing so, the significance of the inner diameter, outer diameter, and material of the capillary to the resulting fringe pattern and subsequent analysis are elucidated for the first time. The inner diameter is shown to dictate the fringe pattern seen, and therefore, the effectiveness of any dechirping algorithm, demonstrating that current dechirping methods are only valid for a subset of capillary dimensions. Potential improvements are suggested in order to guide further research, increase sensitivity, and promote wider applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.