ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Unsupervised Image Registration towards Enhancing Performance and Explainability in Cardiac and Brain Image Analysis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review on Registration Techniques for Cardiac Computed Tomography and Ultrasound Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Self-Enhanced Mixed Attention Network for Three-Modal Images Few-Shot Semantic Segmentation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Successive Next Network as Augmented Regularization for Deformable Brain MR Image Registration.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) typically recruits multiple sequences (defined here as "modalities"). As each modality is designed to offer different anatomical and functional clinical information, there are evident disparities in the imaging content across modalities. Inter- and intra-modality affine and non-rigid image registration is an essential medical image analysis process in clinical imaging, as for example before imaging biomarkers need to be derived and clinically evaluated across different MRI modalities, time phases and slices. Although commonly needed in real clinical scenarios, affine and non-rigid image registration is not extensively investigated using a single unsupervised model architecture. In our work, we present an unsupervised deep learning registration methodology that can accurately model affine and non-rigid transformations, simultaneously. Moreover, inverse-consistency is a fundamental inter-modality registration property that is not considered in deep learning registration algorithms. To address inverse consistency, our methodology performs bi-directional cross-modality image synthesis to learn modality-invariant latent representations, and involves two factorised transformation networks (one per each encoder-decoder channel) and an inverse-consistency loss to learn topology-preserving anatomical transformations. Overall, our model (named "FIRE") shows improved performances against the reference standard baseline method (i.e., Symmetric Normalization implemented using the ANTs toolbox) on multi-modality brain 2D and 3D MRI and intra-modality cardiac 4D MRI data experiments. We focus on explaining model-data components to enhance model explainability in medical image registration. On computational time experiments, we show that the FIRE model performs on a memory-saving mode, as it can inherently learn topology-preserving image registration directly in the training phase. We therefore demonstrate an efficient and versatile registration technique that can have merit in multi-modal image registrations in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.