Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35336234›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Photoinactivation of Phage Phi6 as a SARS-CoV-2 Model in Wastewater: Evidence of Efficacy and Safety.

Marta Gomes, Maria Bartolomeu, Cátia Vieira, Ana T P C Gomes, Maria Amparo F Faustino, Maria Graça P M S Neves, Adelaide Almeida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Membrane-Targeting Antivirals.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marta GomesDepartment of Biology and CESAM, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Maria BartolomeuDepartment of Biology and CESAM, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2986-2088
Cátia VieiraDepartment of Biology and CESAM, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3421-0383
Ana T P C GomesCenter for Interdisciplinary Investigation (CIIS), Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 3504-505 Viseu, Portugal.
Maria Amparo F FaustinoDepartment of Chemistry and LAQV-REQUIMTE, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4423-3802
Maria Graça P M S NevesDepartment of Chemistry and LAQV-REQUIMTE, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7953-8166
Adelaide AlmeidaDepartment of Biology and CESAM, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8422-8664
University of Aveiro · PTRede de Química e Tecnologia · PTUniversidade Católica Portuguesa · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia PREVINE-FCT-PTDC/ASP-PES/29576/2017Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BD/121645/2016Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BD/150358/2019Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UID/AMB/50017/2019Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/50006/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/50017/ 2020 + UIDP/50017/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last two years have been marked by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. This virus is found in the intestinal tract; it reaches wastewater systems and, consequently, the natural receiving water bodies. As such, inefficiently treated wastewater (WW) can be a means of contamination. The currently used methods for the disinfection of WW can lead to the formation of toxic compounds and can be expensive or inefficient. As such, new and alternative approaches must be considered, namely, photodynamic inactivation (PDI). In this work, the bacteriophage φ6 (or, simply, phage φ6), which has been used as a suitable model for enveloped RNA viruses, such as coronaviruses (CoVs), was used as a model of SARS-CoV-2. Firstly, to understand the virus's survival in the environment, phage φ6 was subjected to different laboratory-controlled environmental conditions (temperature, pH, salinity, and solar and UV-B irradiation), and its persistence over time was assessed. Second, to assess the efficiency of PDI towards the virus, assays were performed in both phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), a commonly used aqueous matrix, and a secondarily treated WW (a real WW matrix). Third, as WW is generally discharged into the marine environment after treatment, the safety of PDI-treated WW was assessed through the determination of the viability of native marine water microorganisms after their contact with the PDI-treated effluent. Overall, the results showed that, when used as a surrogate for SARS-CoV-2, phage φ6 remains viable in different environmental conditions for a considerable period. Moreover, PDI proved to be an efficient approach in the inactivation of the viruses, and the PDI-treated effluent showed no toxicity to native aquatic microorganisms under realistic dilution conditions, thus endorsing PDI as an efficient and safe tertiary WW disinfection method. Although all studies were performed with phage φ6, which is considered a suitable model of SARS-CoV-2, further studies using SARS-CoV-2 are necessary; nevertheless, the findings show the potential of PDI for controlling SARS-CoV-2 in WW.

Indexed as

coronavirusenvironmental factorsphage φ6photodynamic inactivation (PDI)porphyrinsPseudomonas syringaeSARS-CoV-2viruseswastewater

Identifiers

PMID35336234
PMCPMC8954818
OpenAlexW4220737920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.