ReviewMicroorganisms2022
Bacterial Biosorbents, an Efficient Heavy Metals Green Clean-Up Strategy: Prospects, Challenges, and Opportunities.
Review in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioremediation potential of lead and cadmium tolerant bacteria isolated from industrial (tannery) effluents.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Microscopic evaluation of Li, Cd, and Co removal from aqueous solutions using equisetum and teucrium: statistical thermodynamic modeling.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Lead (Pb) bioremediation by Sphingobium sp. RO-01 strain isolated from gold mine tailings, Atacama Desert, Chile.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- PGPB Bacillus Megaterium AFI1 and Paenibacillus Nicotianae AFI2 Improve Nutrient Uptake and Stimulate Adaptation of Wheat Under Nickel Exposure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Deciphering microbial approaches for heavy metal removal: an overview on their mechanisms, innovations and future horizons.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Microbial technologies as an ecological tool for advancing environmental sustainability.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Integrated hydrochar-bacteria strategy for heavy metal removal.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Biosorption potential and plant growth promoting activities of zinc tolerant novel Chitinophaga niastensis HMR31 from zinc-infested zone.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- NiMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Optimizing copper phytoremediation and mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) yield through Sinorhizobium meliloti and Piriformospora indica inoculation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A review of a colorimetric biosensor based on FeAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Review
- Hybrid Pennisetum colonization by Bacillus megaterium BM18-2 labeled with green fluorescent protein (GFP) under Cd stress.Archives of microbiology · 2025Article
- Modern-Day Green Strategies for the Removal of Chromium from Wastewater.Journal of xenobiotics · 2024Review
- Genomic and Transcriptomic Analyses Identify Two Key Glycosyltransferase GenesMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Biosorption of copper, nickel, and manganese as well as the production of metal nanoparticles by Bacillus species isolated from soils contaminated with electronic wastes.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024Article
- Adsorption of CdMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Exploring Endophytic Bacteria fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Revisiting the Role of Sensors for Shaping Plant Research: Applications and Future Perspectives.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Effects of heavy metals on bacterial growth parameters in degradation of phenol by an Antarctic bacterial consortium.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024Article
- Regulatory Element Analysis and Comparative Genomics Study of Heavy Metal-Resistant Genes in the Complete GenomeBioinformatics and biology insights · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid industrialization has led to the pollution of soil and water by various types of contaminants. Heavy metals (HMs) are considered the most reactive toxic contaminants, even at low concentrations, which cause health problems through accumulation in the food chain and water. Remediation using conventional methods, including physical and chemical techniques, is a costly treatment process and generates toxic by-products, which may negatively affect the surrounding environment. Therefore, biosorption has attracted significant research interest in the recent decades. In contrast to existing methods, bacterial biomass offers a potential alternative for recovering toxic/persistent HMs from the environment through different mechanisms for metal ion uptake. This review provides an outlook of the advantages and disadvantages of the current bioremediation technologies and describes bacterial groups, especially extremophiles with biosorbent potential for heavy metal removal with relevant examples and perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.