ArticleMicroorganisms2022
Antimicrobial Resistance in
Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of antimicrobial-resistantOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli From Diagnostic Fecal and Uterine Samples of Swine in Northern Vietnam.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
- Distribution and characteristics of ceftiofur-resistant Escherichia coli throughout the broiler production chain in Korea.Veterinary research · 2026Article
- Genomic Insights into Ciprofloxacin-Resistant EnteropathogenicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Temporal trends inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Colistin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biosecurity Practices for Reducing Antimicrobial Use in Commercial Broiler Farms in Korea.The journal of poultry science · 2025Article
- Dairy Cattle and the Iconic Autochthonous Cattle in Northern Portugal Are Reservoirs of Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Investigation of Antibiotic Resistance ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Meat ducks as carriers of antimicrobial-resistantJournal of veterinary science · 2024Article
- Prevalence of Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli in the feces of free-roaming wildlife throughout South Korea.PloS one · 2024Article
- Determination of Multi-Class Antimicrobial Residues and Antimicrobial Resistance in Cow Milk and Feces Samples during Withdrawal Period.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance in CommensalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Evaluating Antimicrobial Resistance Trends in CommensalMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Mini-Review: Antibiotic-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Emotive Themes from Tennessee Cattle Producers Regarding Responsible Antibiotic Use.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Thymol as an Adjuvant to Restore Antibiotic Efficacy and Reduce Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Expression in EnterotoxigenicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A pharmacodynamic investigation to assess the synergism of orbifloxacin and propyl gallate againstFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in food animals pose a major public health threat worldwide. In this study, we aimed to assess the antimicrobial resistance profiles and resistance trends of commensal Escherichia coli isolated from the feces of healthy cattle, pigs, and chickens in South Korea during 2010 and 2020. A total of 7237 E. coli isolates (2733 cattle, 2542 pig, and 1962 chicken isolates) were tested for susceptibility towards 12 antimicrobials. About 48%, 90%, and 97% of cattle, pig, and chicken isolates, respectively, were resistant to one or more antimicrobial agents. Cattle isolates presented low resistance (<15%) to most of the tested antimicrobials. In contrast, chicken and pig isolates demonstrated a relatively high (>45%) resistance rate to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, and tetracycline. We observed high ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid resistance rates in chicken (76.1% and 88.6%, respectively), isolates in pig (12.7% and 26.7%, respectively) and cattle (2.7% and 8.2%, respectively) isolates. Notably, a very small proportion of isolates (<5%) from cattle, chickens, and pigs demonstrated resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, and colistin. We identified ceftiofur resistance in a small proportion of chicken (8.8%), pig (3.7%), and cattle (0.7%) isolates. We noted an increasing but fluctuating trend of ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ceftiofur, cefoxitin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, and streptomycin resistance in pig isolates. Similarly, the ampicillin, ceftiofur, and chloramphenicol resistance rates were increased but fluctuated through time in chicken isolates. Overall, 56% of the isolates showed multidrug-resistant (MDR). The proportion of MDR isolates was low in cattle (17.1%); however, this proportion was high in chickens (87.1%) and pigs (73.7%). Most of the resistance patterns included streptomycin and tetracycline in pigs and cattle, and ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid in chickens. In conclusion, this study showed high resistance of commensal E. coli isolated from major food animals in Korea to commonly used antimicrobials including critically important antimicrobials. These bacteria could not only be a resistance reservoir but also could have potential to spread this resistance through gene transfer to pathogenic bacteria. Thus, the high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in food animals highlights the urgent need for measures to restrict and ensure the prudent use of antimicrobials in Korea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.