Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35336017›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

Pharmacokinetic Variability in Pre-Clinical Studies: Sample Study with Abiraterone in Rats and Implications for Short-Term Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study Designs.

Jana Královičová, Aleš Bartůněk, Jiří Hofmann, Tomáš Křížek, Petr Kozlík, Jaroslava Roušarová, Pavel Ryšánek, Martin Šíma, Ondřej Slanař

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Development andDrug delivery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jana KrálovičováDepartment of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Albertov 4, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7491-7431
Aleš BartůněkDepartment of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Albertov 4, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jiří HofmannZentiva k.s., U Kabelovny 130, 10237 Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomáš KřížekDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Hlavova 8, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr KozlíkDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Hlavova 8, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jaroslava RoušarováDepartment of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Albertov 4, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel RyšánekDepartment of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Albertov 4, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6727-1663
Martin ŠímaDepartment of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Albertov 4, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6541-738X
Ondřej SlanařDepartment of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Albertov 4, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5357-7562
Charles University · CZ

Funding

Charles University Cooperatio Program (research area PHAR)Charles University SVV 260 523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the major concerns for all in vivo experiments is intra- and inter-subject variability, which can be a great source of inaccuracy. The aim of this study is, therefore, to estimate the ability of parallel vs. cross-over design studies in order to describe the relative pharmacokinetic performance of the studied drug formulations. We analyzed the data from a drug development program that examined the performance of innovative abiraterone acetate formulations against the identical reference product in three stages. In stages 1-3, groups A-F were dosed with the reference product once in a parallel manner. Stage 4 was performed to evaluate the intra-individual variability (IIV) by repeated administration of the reference product to the same animals. Although the geometric mean (90% CI) values of abiraterone AUC

Indexed as

abirateronecross-over designin vivo studypharmacokineticsratvariability

Identifiers

PMID35336017
PMCPMC8955109
OpenAlexW4220685531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.