Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35335999›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

Clinical Pharmacokinetic Assessment of Kratom (

Rakshit S Tanna, James T Nguyen, Deena L Hadi, Preston K Manwill, Laura Flores-Bocanegra, Matthew E Layton, John R White, Nadja B Cech, Nicholas H Oberlies, Allan E Rettie and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluating the drug interactions in kratom usage: clinical application.Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Translating Kratom-Drug Interactions: From Bedside to Bench and Back.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rakshit S TannaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99202, USA.
James T NguyenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99202, USA.
Deena L HadiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99202, USA.
Preston K ManwillDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6072-1067
Laura Flores-BocanegraDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA.
Matthew E LaytonElson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99202, USA.
John R WhiteDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99202, USA.
Nadja B CechCenter of Excellence for Natural Product Drug Interaction Research, Spokane, WA 99202, USA.
Nicholas H OberliesCenter of Excellence for Natural Product Drug Interaction Research, Spokane, WA 99202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0354-8464
Allan E RettieCenter of Excellence for Natural Product Drug Interaction Research, Spokane, WA 99202, USA.
Kenneth E ThummelCenter of Excellence for Natural Product Drug Interaction Research, Spokane, WA 99202, USA.
Mary F PaineDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3331-1839
Washington State University Spokane · USUniversity of North Carolina at Greensboro · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Pharmacology CoreU54AT008909 · NCCIH · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PAINE, MARY F · 2015 to 2024
$22.4M
NCCIH NIH HHS U54 AT008909NCCIH NIH HHS U54 AT008909, U54 AT008909-04S2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing use of the botanical kratom to self-manage opioid withdrawal and pain has led to increased kratom-linked overdose deaths. Despite these serious safety concerns, rigorous fundamental pharmacokinetic knowledge of kratom in humans remains lacking. We assessed the pharmacokinetics of a single low dose (2 g) of a well-characterized kratom product administered orally to six healthy participants. Median concentration-time profiles for the kratom alkaloids examined were best described by a two-compartment model with central elimination. Pronounced pharmacokinetic differences between alkaloids with the 3

Indexed as

botanicalsclinical trialscompartmental modelingdiastereomerskratommitragynineopioidspharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID35335999
PMCPMC8950611
OpenAlexW4221122975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.