Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35335942›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

Does Valved Holding Chamber Improve Aerosol Lung Deposition with a Jet Nebulizer? A Randomized Crossover Study.

Luciana Alcoforado, Dulciane Nunes Paiva, Arzu Ari, Jacqueline de Melo Barcelar, Simone Cristina Soares Brandão, James B Fink, Armele Dornelas de Andrade

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Luciana AlcoforadoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50710-560, PE, Brazil.
Dulciane Nunes PaivaDepartment of Physical Education and Health, Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul, Santa Cruz do Sul 96815-010, RS, Brazil.
Arzu AriDepartment of Respiratory Therapy, Texas State University, Austin, TX 73301, USA.
Jacqueline de Melo BarcelarDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50710-560, PE, Brazil.
Simone Cristina Soares BrandãoMedicine Nuclear Department, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50710-560, PE, Brazil.
James B FinkDepartment of Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Division of Respiratory Care, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60007, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6527-2363
Armele Dornelas de AndradeDepartment of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50710-560, PE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9430-4395
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRRush University Medical Center · USTexas State University · USUniversidade de Santa Cruz do Sul · BR

Funding

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 310036/2017-8National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 428841/2018-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using valved holding chambers (VHC) during aerosol therapy has been reported to improve the inhaled dose with various aerosol devices, including vibrating mesh nebulizers. The aim of this study was to quantify the pulmonary deposition of a jet nebulizer (JN) with and without a VHC, and a mesh nebulizer (MN) with a VHC in a randomized cross-over trial with seven healthy consenting adults. Our hypothesis was that the use of a VHC would improve deposition with the JN. Diethylnitriaminopentacetic acid with technetium (DTPA-Tc99m), with the activity of 1 mC with 0.9% saline solution was nebulized. The radiolabeled aerosol was detected by 2D planar scintigraphy after administration. The pulmonary deposition was greater with a JN with a VHC (4.5%) than a JN alone (3.2%; p = 0.005. However, an MN with a VHC (30.0%) was six-fold greater than a JN or JN with a VHC (p < 0.001). The extrapulmonary deposition was higher in the JN group without a VHC than in the other two modalities (p < 0.001). Deposition in the device was greater with a JN + VHC than an MN+/VHC (p < 0.001). Lower residual drug at the end of the dose was detected with an MN than either JN configuration. The exhaled dose was greater with a JN alone than either an MN or JN with VHC (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the addition of the VHC did not substantially improve the efficiency of aerosol lung deposition over a JN alone.

Indexed as

aerosol deliveryjet nebulizerscintigraphyspacervalved holding chambervibrating mesh nebulizer

Identifiers

PMID35335942
PMCPMC8956008
OpenAlexW4220674143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.