ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Comparative Study on Nanotoxicity in Human Primary and Cancer Cells.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surface chemistry governs sex-dependent responses to PEG and zwitterionic siRNA nanocarriers in primary macrophages.Science advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Looking at the fraction with Annexin V⁺ and propidium iodide⁺: insights into cell death types from preclinical studies in solid and haematological cancers.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Review
- Predictive and Mechanism-Based Toxicity Evaluation of Engineered Nanoparticles.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Potential of Glucose Oxidase-Loaded Biogenic Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles in Ovarian Cancer.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Oxidative impact on lipoprotein structure: Insights from dynamic light scattering.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
- Recent developments in cancer diagnosis and treatment using nanotechnology.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Nanoparticles and Airway Epithelial Cells: Exploring the Impacts and Methodologies in Toxicity Assessment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Nanotechnology in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Data-Driven Quantitative Intrinsic Hazard Criteria for Nanoproduct Development in a Safe-by-Design Paradigm: A Case Study of Silver Nanoforms.ACS applied nano materials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanomaterial toxicity tests using normal and cancer cells may yield markedly different results. Here, nanomaterial toxicity between cancer and primary human cells was compared to determine the basic cell line selection criteria for nanomaterial toxicity analyses. Specifically, we exposed two cancer (A549 and HepG2) and two normal cell lines (NHBE and HH) cell lines to SiO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.