Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35335549›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

A Molecular Dynamics Study of Monomer Melt Properties of Cyanate Ester Monomer Melt Properties.

Rebecca T Haber, Andrea R Browning, Bayleigh R Graves, William P Davis, Jeffrey S Wiggins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca T HaberSchool of Polymer Science and Engineering, University of Southern Mississippi, 118 College Dr, #5050, Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA.
Andrea R BrowningSchrödinger, Inc., Portland, OR 97204, USA.
Bayleigh R GravesSchool of Polymer Science and Engineering, University of Southern Mississippi, 118 College Dr, #5050, Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA.
William P DavisDepartment of Mathematics, Western Washington University, 516 High St., Bellingham, WA 98225, USA.
Jeffrey S WigginsSchool of Polymer Science and Engineering, University of Southern Mississippi, 118 College Dr, #5050, Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this work was to computationally predict the melting temperature and melt properties of thermosetting monomers used in aerospace applications. In this study, we applied an existing voids method by Solca. to examine four cyanate ester monomers with a wide range of melting temperatures. Voids were introduced into some simulations by removal of molecules from lattice positions to lower the free-energy barrier to melting to directly simulate the transition from a stable crystal to amorphous solid and capture the melting temperature. We validated model predictions by comparing melting temperature against previously reported literature values. Additionally, the torsion and orientational order parameters were used to examine the monomers' freedom of motion to investigate structure-property relationships. Ultimately, the voids method provided reasonable estimates of melting temperature while the torsion and order parameter analysis provided insight into sources of the differing melt properties between the thermosetting monomers. As a whole, the results shed light on how freedom of molecular motions in the monomer melt state may affect melting temperature and can be utilized to inspire the development of thermosetting monomers with optimal monomer melt properties for demanding applications.

Indexed as

cyanate estermelting temperaturemolecular dynamicsmolecular simulationmonomer melt

Identifiers

PMID35335549
PMCPMC8951156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.