Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35335453›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Linearization of Composite Material Damage Model Results and Its Impact on the Subsequent Stress-Strain Analysis.

Jarmil Vlach, Radek Doubrava, Roman Růžek, Jan Raška, Jan Horňas, Martin Kadlec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jarmil VlachVZLU-Czech Aerospace Research Center, 199 05 Prague, Czech Republic.
Radek DoubravaVZLU-Czech Aerospace Research Center, 199 05 Prague, Czech Republic.
Roman RůžekVZLU-Czech Aerospace Research Center, 199 05 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7318-1514
Jan RaškaVZLU-Czech Aerospace Research Center, 199 05 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan HorňasVZLU-Czech Aerospace Research Center, 199 05 Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin KadlecVZLU-Czech Aerospace Research Center, 199 05 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-2451-6098

Funding

European Union 886703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To solve problems in the field of mechanical engineering efficiently, individual numerical procedures must be developed, and solvers must be adapted. This study applies the results of a carbon-fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) analysis along with the nonlinear finite element damage (FE) method to the translation of a linear solver. The analyzed tensile test sample is modelled using the ply-by-ply method. To describe the nonlinear post-damage behavior of the material, the Hashin model is used. To validate the transformation, an analysis and comparison of the damage results of the linearized and nonlinear model is carried out. Job linearization was performed by collecting elements into groups based on their level of damage and pairing them with unique material cards. Potentially suitable mathematical functions are tested for the grouping and consolidation of the elements. The results show that the agreement of some presented methods depends on the damage level. The influence of the selected statistical functions on the result is shown here. The optimal solution is demonstrated, and the most efficient method of linearization is presented. The main motivation behind this work is that the problem has not been discussed in the literature and that there is currently no commercial software translator that provides the transference of models between solvers.

Indexed as

compositedamage simulationHashinlinearizationlinear solvernon-linear solver

Identifiers

PMID35335453
PMCPMC8949470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.