ReviewPolymers2022
3D Printing of Polymeric Bioresorbable Stents: A Strategy to Improve Both Cellular Compatibility and Mechanical Properties.
Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiovascular stent technologies for coronary and valvular heart disease: the potential of 3D printing for stent fabrication.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Topology-Driven Mechanical Tuning of FDM-Printed TPU Tubular Lattices with Auxetic Architectures.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Article
- Vat Photopolymerization of Smart Polymers for Biomedical Applications.ACS applied polymer materials · 2025Review
- Comparative Evaluation of Incidence of Cardiovascular Events Among Different Drug-Eluting Stent Features: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Influence of Material Selection on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Tracheal Stents for Surgical Applications.Polymers · 2025Article
- Influence of Stent Structure on Mechanical and Degradation Properties of Poly (Lactic Acid) Vascular Stent.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the interface of metallic-coated biodegradable polymeric stents with prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- From Soft Lithography to 3D Printing: Current Status and Future of Microfluidic Device Fabrication.Polymers · 2025Review
- Stimuli-responsive Nano/Biomaterials for Smart Drug Delivery in Cardiovascular Diseases: Promises, Challenges and Outlooks.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- A novel paclitaxel eluting bioresorbable vascular stent with a super flexible stent structure and round cross section struts fabricated using 3D printing technology with a rotating platform.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
- Moving away from metal: Step toward the future with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and novel antiproliferative agents.JVS-vascular science · 2025Article
- Biliary stents for active materials and surface modification: Recent advances and future perspectives.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Supercritical Impregnation of PETG withPolymers · 2024Article
- Polymer-Drug Anti-Thrombogenic and Hemocompatible Coatings as Surface Modifications.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Biomimicking Atherosclerotic Vessels: A Relevant and (Yet) Sub-Explored Topic.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Recent development and future application of biodegradable ureteral stents.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Understanding Atherosclerosis Pathophysiology: Can Additive Manufacturing Be Helpful?Polymers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
One of the leading causes of death is cardiovascular disease, and the most common cardiovascular disease is coronary artery disease. Percutaneous coronary intervention and vascular stents have emerged as a solution to treat coronary artery disease. Nowadays, several types of vascular stents share the same purpose: to reduce the percentage of restenosis, thrombosis, and neointimal hyperplasia and supply mechanical support to the blood vessels. Despite the numerous efforts to create an ideal stent, there is no coronary stent that simultaneously presents the appropriate cellular compatibility and mechanical properties to avoid stent collapse and failure. One of the emerging approaches to solve these problems is improving the mechanical performance of polymeric bioresorbable stents produced through additive manufacturing. Although there have been numerous studies in this field, normalized control parameters for 3D-printed polymeric vascular stents fabrication are absent. The present paper aims to present an overview of the current types of stents and the main polymeric materials used to fabricate the bioresorbable vascular stents. Furthermore, a detailed description of the printing parameters' influence on the mechanical performance and degradation profile of polymeric bioresorbable stents is presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.