Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35335405›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Application of Soft Computing Techniques to Predict the Strength of Geopolymer Composites.

Qichen Wang, Waqas Ahmad, Ayaz Ahmad, Fahid Aslam, Abdullah Mohamed, Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Geopolymer: A Systematic Review of Methodologies.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Qichen WangDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Waqas AhmadDepartment of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad 22060, Pakistan.
Ayaz AhmadDepartment of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad 22060, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0312-2965
Fahid AslamDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2863-3283
Abdullah MohamedResearch Centre, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo 11745, Egypt.
Nikolai Ivanovich VatinPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195291 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1196-8004
COMSATS University Islamabad · PKFuture University in Egypt · EGPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University · RUPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SAUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 075-15-2021-1333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geopolymers may be the best alternative to ordinary Portland cement because they are manufactured using waste materials enriched in aluminosilicate. Research on geopolymer composites is accelerating. However, considerable work, expense, and time are needed to cast, cure, and test specimens. The application of computational methods to the stated objective is critical for speedy and cost-effective research. In this study, supervised machine learning approaches were employed to predict the compressive strength of geopolymer composites. One individual machine learning approach, decision tree, and two ensembled machine learning approaches, AdaBoost and random forest, were used. The coefficient correlation (R

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecompressive strengthgeopolymer compositesmachine learningprediction modelssustainable materials

Identifiers

PMID35335405
PMCPMC8956037
OpenAlexW4220993526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.