Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35335139›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Plant-Derived Antiviral Compounds as Potential Entry Inhibitors against Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Wild-Type and Delta Variant: An Integrative in SilicoApproach.

Jenifer Mallavarpu Ambrose, Malathi Kullappan, Shankargouda Patil, Khalid J Alzahrani, Hamsa Jameel Banjer, Fadi S I Qashqari, A Thirumal Raj, Shilpa Bhandi, Vishnu Priya Veeraraghavan, Selvaraj Jayaraman and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Jenifer Mallavarpu AmbroseDepartment of Research, Panimalar Medical College Hospital & Research Institute, Chennai 600123, India.
Malathi KullappanDepartment of Research, Panimalar Medical College Hospital & Research Institute, Chennai 600123, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2981-6751
Shankargouda PatilDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, Division of Oral Pathology, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45412, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7246-5497
Khalid J AlzahraniDepartment of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6688-0106
Hamsa Jameel BanjerDepartment of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2841-5438
Fadi S I QashqariDepartment of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24381, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7138-5695
A Thirumal RajDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sri Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Chennai 600130, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1079-1024
Shilpa BhandiDepartment of Restorative Dental Science, Division of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Vishnu Priya VeeraraghavanCentre of Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics (COMManD), Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, India.
Selvaraj JayaramanCentre of Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics (COMManD), Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7726-1423
Durairaj SekarCentre for Cellular and Molecular Research, Saveetha Dental College & Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical & Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0722-8636
Alok AgarwalDepartment of Chemistry, Chinmaya Degree College, BHEL Haridwar 249403, India.
Korla SwapnavahiniDepartment of Biotechnology, Dr B.R. Ambedkar University, Etcherla, Srikakulam 532410, India.
Surapaneni Krishna MohanDepartments of Biochemistry, Molecular Virology, Research, and Clinical Skills & Simulation, Panimalar Medical College Hospital & Research Institute, Chennai 600123, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5204-5708
Panimalar Medical College Hospital & Research InstituteSaveetha University · INJazan University · SATaif University · SABharat Heavy Electricals (India) · INDr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar University · INSri Venkateswara Medical College and Ruia Hospital · INUmm al-Qura University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wild-type SARS-CoV-2 has continuously evolved into several variants with increased transmissibility and virulence. The Delta variant which was initially identified in India created a devastating impact throughout the country during the second wave. While the efficacy of the existing vaccines against the latest SARS-CoV-2 variants remains unclear, extensive research is being carried out to develop potential antiviral drugs through approaches like in silico screening and drug-repurposing. This study aimed to conduct the docking-based virtual screening of 50 potential phytochemical compounds against a Spike glycoprotein of the wild-type and the Delta SARS-CoV-2 variant. Subsequently, molecular docking was performed for the five best compounds, such as Lupeol, Betulin, Hypericin, Corilagin, and Geraniin, along with synthetic controls. From the results obtained, it was evident that Lupeol exhibited a remarkable binding affinity towards the wild-type Spike protein (-8.54 kcal/mol), while Betulin showed significant binding interactions with the mutated Spike protein (-8.83 kcal/mol), respectively. The binding energy values of the selected plant compounds were slightly higher than that of the controls. Key hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions of the resulting complexes were visualized, which explained their greater binding affinity against the target proteins-the Delta S protein of SARS-CoV-2, in particular. The lower RMSD, the RMSF values of the complexes and the ligands, Rg, H-bonds, and the binding free energies of the complexes together revealed the stability of the complexes and significant binding affinities of the ligands towards the target proteins. Our study suggests that Lupeol and Betulin could be considered as potential ligands for SARS-CoV-2 spike antagonists. Further experimental validations might provide new insights for the possible antiviral therapeutic interventions of the identified lead compounds and their analogs against COVID-19 infection.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentHumansMolecular Docking SimulationSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntiviral AgentsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2antiviral agentsCOVID-19delta variantmolecular dynamics and simulationsmolecular modelingphytochemical compoundsSARS-CoV-2spike glycoproteinvirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID35335139
PMCPMC8949152
OpenAlexW4220968386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.