Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35335035›Full record

ReviewVaccines2022

Toward a Multivalent Synthetic Oligosaccharide-Based Conjugate Vaccine against

Armelle Phalipon, Laurence A Mulard

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. TestingPharmaceutics · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Development of themSphere · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Toward aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. The Diversity ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  17. Comparison ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Frontiers inVaccines · 2022
    Article
  20. TheVaccines · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Armelle PhaliponInstitut Pasteur, Innovation Lab. Vaccines, F-75015 Paris, France.
Laurence A MulardInstitut Pasteur, Université de Paris, CNRS UMR3523, Unité Chimie des Biomolécules, F-75015 Paris, France.
Institut Pasteur · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR, Grants ANR-06-EMPB-013, ANR-05-BLAN-0022, ANR-08-PCVI-0002, ANR-15-CE07-0019Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Grant agreement Investment ID OPP1191130, OPP1198140, OPP1201194Bill and Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute Contract ID: Collaboration & License Agreement (Institut Pasteur, Gates MRI), December 2019European Union Seventh Framework Program PF7-Health ID 261472-STOPENTERICSInstitut Pasteur Institut Pasteur (Grants PTR 99, GPH-FlexBiVac, Roux Cantarini and Pasteur Roux Cantarini Postdoctoral Fellowships, COMED-SF2a, INNOV-42-19)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review focuses on the molecular glycovaccine concept, a promising option to develop a

Indexed as

carbohydratesconjugate vaccinesglycoconjugatesO-antigensShigellasynthetic glycans

Identifiers

PMID35335035
PMCPMC8954881
OpenAlexW4220874109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.