Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35334997›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

"Would You Get Vaccinated against COVID-19?" The Picture Emerging from a Study on the Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the General Population of the Veneto Region.

Silvia Cocchio, Giulia Tremolada, Patrizia Furlan, Michele Nicoletti, Federico Zabeo, Marco Fonzo, Michele Tonon, Francesca Russo, Vincenzo Baldo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Silvia CocchioDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Giulia TremoladaDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Patrizia FurlanDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Michele NicolettiDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0233-9134
Federico ZabeoDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6321-7272
Marco FonzoDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Michele TononRegional Directorate of Prevention, Food Safety, Veterinary, Public Health-Veneto Region, 30123 Venezia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4917-404X
Francesca RussoRegional Directorate of Prevention, Food Safety, Veterinary, Public Health-Veneto Region, 30123 Venezia, Italy.
Vincenzo BaldoDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6012-9453

Funding

Veneto Region DGR 1643 del 24/11/2020. "Project to assess the prevalence and spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the population" in: Bollettino Ufficiale Regione Veneto n. 193 del 15/12/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 disease, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, continues to cause high hospitalization and death rates. Vaccination campaigns have been key to controlling the pandemic, but vaccine hesitancy is on the rise. This study investigated the general population’s attitude to vaccination in Veneto (northeast Italy) in January 2021 as part of a study on the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. An ad hoc questionnaire collected 4467 respondents’ sociodemographic data and propensity to be vaccinated, and findings were analyzed using logistic multivariable regression. The 48.9% of respondents were male, and the mean age was 46.8 ± 16.0 years. Asked whether they would get vaccinated against COVID-19, 84.3% said yes, 5.0% were uncertain, and 10.7% said no. Vaccine acceptance was higher in males than in females (85.8% vs. 82.8%), in people 70+ years old (92.3%), and among people with more than 14 years of schooling (89.6%). Multivariable analysis with adjOR (95% CI) showed a significantly greater vaccine reluctance in females (0.68 (0.57−0.81)), people 30−49 or 50−69 years old (0.69 (0.54−0.87)), and (0.76 (0.58−0.99)); and those with <9 or 9−13 years of schooling (0.62 (0.46−0.82)), and (0.72 (0.57−0.91)). As people refusing vaccination undeniably hinder efforts to control the pandemic, specific strategies are needed to overcome their doubts.

Indexed as

COVID-19 vaccinegeneral populationpoint of viewquestionnairevaccine acceptancevaccine reluctance

Identifiers

PMID35334997
PMCPMC8951628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.