Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35334857›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2022

Review of the Impact Pathways of Biofortified Foods and Food Products.

Samantha L Huey, Jesse T Krisher, Arini Bhargava, Valerie M Friesen, Elsa M Konieczynski, Mduduzi N N Mbuya, Neel H Mehta, Eva Monterrosa, Annette M Nyangaresi, Saurabh Mehta

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Elevated COFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bioaccumulation Capacity of Onion (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Approaches to Address the Anemia Challenge.The Journal of nutrition · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Samantha L HueyDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9774-8642
Jesse T KrisherDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Arini BhargavaDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Valerie M FriesenGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4691-9410
Elsa M KonieczynskiDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Mduduzi N N MbuyaGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Washington, DC 20036, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1230-2367
Neel H MehtaDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5144-4635
Eva MonterrosaGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.
Annette M NyangaresiGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Nairobi 00800, Kenya.
Saurabh MehtaDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3788-0665
Cornell University · USGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition · CHAmerican Society for Nutrition · US

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and the Nether-lands Ministry of Foreign Affairs N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofortification is the process of increasing the concentrations and/or bioavailability of micronutrients in staple crops and has the potential to mitigate micronutrient deficiencies globally. Efficacy trials have demonstrated benefits of consuming biofortified crops (BFCs); and in this paper, we report on the results of a systematic review of biofortified crops effectiveness in real-world settings. We synthesized the evidence on biofortified crops consumption through four Impact Pathways: (1) purchased directly; (2) in informal settings; (3) in formal settings; or (4) in farmer households, from their own production. Twenty-five studies, covering Impact Pathway 1 (five studies), Impact Pathway 2 (three), Impact Pathway 3 (three), Impact Pathway 4 (21) were included. The review found evidence of an improvement in micronutrient status via Impact Pathway 4 (mainly in terms of vitamin A from orange sweet potato) in controlled interventions that involved the creation of demand, the extension of agriculture and promotion of marketing. In summary, evidence supports that biofortified crops can be part of food systems interventions to reduce micronutrient deficiencies in farmer households; ongoing and future research will help fully inform their potential along the other three Impact Pathways for scaling up.

Indexed as

BiofortificationFood, FortifiedBiological AvailabilityCrops, AgriculturalMicronutrientsMicronutrientsbiofortificationbiofortified cropsbiofortified food productsbiofortified foodseffectivenessimpact evaluationmicronutrient concentrationsmicronutrient deficiency

Identifiers

PMID35334857
PMCPMC8952206
OpenAlexW4220905559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.