Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35334254›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2022

Uncovering post-translational modification-associated protein-protein interactions.

Shu Wang, Arianna O Osgood, Abhishek Chatterjee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shu WangDepartment of Chemistry, Boston College, 2609 Beacon Street, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA.
Arianna O OsgoodDepartment of Chemistry, Boston College, 2609 Beacon Street, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA.
Abhishek ChatterjeeDepartment of Chemistry, Boston College, 2609 Beacon Street, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA. Electronic address: abhishek.chatterjee@bc.edu.

Funding

A genetically encoded toolset to decipher the biology of post-translational modifications in the mammalian proteomeR35GM136437 · NIGMS · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI Abhishek Chatterjee · 2020 to 2026
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In living systems, the chemical space and functional repertoire of proteins are dramatically expanded through the post-translational modification (PTM) of various amino acid residues. These modifications frequently trigger unique protein-protein interactions (PPIs) - for example with reader proteins that directly bind the modified amino acid residue - which leads to downstream functional outcomes. The modification of a protein can also perturb its PPI network indirectly, for example, through altering its conformation or subcellular localization. Uncovering the network of unique PTM-triggered PPIs is essential to fully understand the roles of an ever-expanding list of PTMs in our biology. In this review, we discuss established strategies and current challenges associated with this endeavor.

Indexed as

Protein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteinsAmino AcidsAmino AcidsProteins

Identifiers

PMID35334254
PMCPMC9464464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.