Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35334232›Full record

ReviewNeuron2022

Logistic analysis of choice data: A primer.

Camillo Padoa-Schioppa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neuronal Activity in Orbitofrontal Cortex during Trinary Choices under Risk.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Interference of Mid-level Speech and Noise Statistics Underlies Human Speech Recognition Sensitivity in Natural Environmental Noise.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Neuronal Activity in the Gustatory Cortex during Economic Choice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  18. Sensory choices as logistic classification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Camillo Padoa-SchioppaDepartment of Neuroscience, Department of Economics, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. Electronic address: camillo@wustl.edu.

Funding

THE ROLE OF PREFRONTAL REGIONS IN ECONOMIC CHOICE AND CHOICE-GUIDED BEHAVIORR01DA032758 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Camillo Padoa-Schioppa · 2012 to 2026
$5.4M
NEURONAL MECHANISMS OF GOOD-BASED ECONOMIC DECISIONSR01MH104494 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PADOA-SCHIOPPA, CAMILLO · 2015 to 2025
$4.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032758NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Logistic regressions were developed in economics to model individual choice behavior. In recent years, they have become an important tool in decision neuroscience. Here, I describe and discuss different logistic models, emphasizing the underlying assumptions and possible interpretations. Logistic models may be used to quantify a variety of behavioral traits, including the relative subjective value of different goods, the choice accuracy, risk attitudes, and choice biases. More complex logistic models can be used for choices between good bundles, in cases of nonlinear value functions, and for choices between multiple options. Finally, logistic models can quantify the explanatory power of neuronal activity on choices, thus providing a valid alternative to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorNeurosciencesDecision MakingNeuronsbehavioral economicschoice biaseschoice variabilitydecision makingneuroeconomicssubjective value

Identifiers

PMID35334232
PMCPMC9119943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.