ReviewTissue engineering and regenerative medicine2022
Nanomaterial for Skeletal Muscle Regeneration.
Review in Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Nanotechnological Strategies to Promote Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in Aging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Innovations in skeletal muscle regeneration: from physiology to bioengineering approaches for repair and restoration.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Exercise rejuvenates the "muscle-heart" crosstalk: skeletal muscle-derived exosomal miRNAs in cardiac aging.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Recent advances in applications of nanoparticles and decellularized ECM for organoid engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Advancements in two-dimensional nanomaterials for regenerative medicine in skeletal muscle repair.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Gold nanoparticles modulate macrophage polarization to promote skeletal muscle regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Cell-scale porosity minimizes foreign body reaction and promotes innervated myofiber formation after volumetric muscle loss.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2025Article
- Scientific and Technological Prospecting on Polymeric Particles Containing Extracellular Matrix Peptides for the Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Recent advances in drug delivery and formulation · 2025Review
- Musculoskeletal Organs-on-Chips: An Emerging Platform for Studying the Nanotechnology-Biology Interface.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Advances in nanomaterial-mediated CRISPR/Cas delivery: from lipid nanoparticles to vesicle-derived systems.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Quantitative analysis of the dexamethasone side effect on human-derived young and aged skeletal muscle by myotube and nuclei segmentation using deep learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Exploring the Antioxidant Mechanisms of Nanoceria in Protecting HT22 Cells from Oxidative Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Durable Muscle Extracellular Matrix Engineered with Adhesive Phenolic Moieties for Effective Skeletal Muscle Regeneration in Muscle Atrophy.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Article
- Delivery of miR-15b-5p via magnetic nanoparticle-enhanced bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles mitigates diabetic osteoporosis by targeting GFAP.Cell biology and toxicology · 2024Article
- Immunomodulation for Tissue Repair and Regeneration.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2023Review
- Functional hydrogels for the repair and regeneration of tissue defects.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Silica-Capped and Gold-Decorated Silica Nanoparticles for Enhancing Effect of Gold Nanoparticle-Based Photothermal Therapy.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022Article
- Nano-sized Materials for Tissue Regeneration and Immune/Cancer Therapy.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Skeletal muscle has an innate regenerative capacity to restore their structure and function following acute damages and injuries. However, in congenital muscular dystrophies, large volumetric muscle loss, cachexia, or aging, the declined regenerative capacity of skeletal muscle results in muscle wasting and functional impairment. Recent studies indicate that muscle mass and function are closely correlated with morbidity and mortality due to the large volume and location of skeletal muscle. However, the options for treating neuromuscular disorders are limited. Biomedical engineering strategies such as nanotechnologies have been implemented to address this issue.In this review, we focus on recent studies leveraging nano-sized materials for regeneration of skeletal muscle. We look at skeletal muscle pathologies and describe various proof-of-concept and pre-clinical studies that have used nanomaterials, with a focus on how nano-sized materials can be used for skeletal muscle regeneration depending on material dimensionality.Depending on the dimensionality of nano-sized materials, their application have been changed because of their different physical and biochemical properties.Nanomaterials have been spotlighted as a great candidate for addressing the unmet needs of regenerative medicine. Nanomaterials could be applied to several types of tissues and diseases along with the unique characteristics of nanomaterials. However, when confined to muscle tissue, the targets of nanomaterial applications are limited and can be extended in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.