Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35333975›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2022

Long-term outcomes of children with neonatal transfer: the Japan Environment and Children's Study.

Katsuya Hirata, Kimiko Ueda, Kazuko Wada, Satoyo Ikehara, Kanami Tanigawa, Tadashi Kimura, Keiichi Ozono, Hiroyasu Iso, Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katsuya HirataDepartment of Neonatal Medicine, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, 840 Murodo-cho, Izumi, Osaka, 594-1101, Japan. khirata0513@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3148-9892
Kimiko UedaOsaka Maternal and Child Health Information Center, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, Izumi, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuko WadaDepartment of Neonatal Medicine, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, 840 Murodo-cho, Izumi, Osaka, 594-1101, Japan.
Satoyo IkeharaPublic Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Kanami TanigawaPublic Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Tadashi KimuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Keiichi OzonoDepartment of Pediatrics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroyasu IsoPublic Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group
The University of Osaka · JPOsaka Women's and Children's Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the association of neonatal transfer with the risk of neurodevelopmental outcomes at 3 years of age. Data were obtained from the Japan Environment and Children's Study. A general population of 103,060 pregnancies with 104,062 fetuses was enrolled in the study in 15 Regional Centers between January 2011 and March 2014. Live-born singletons at various gestational ages, including term infants, without congenital anomalies who were followed up until 3 years were included. Neurodevelopmental impairment was assessed using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, third edition (ASQ-3) at 3 years of age. Logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted risk and 95% confidence interval (CI) for newborns with neonatal transfer. Socioeconomic and perinatal factors were included as potential confounders in the analysis. Among 83,855 live-born singletons without congenital anomalies, 65,710 children were studied. Among them, 2780 (4.2%) were transferred in the neonatal period. After adjustment for potential confounders, the incidence of neurodevelopmental impairment (scores below the cut-off value of all 5 domains in the ASQ-3) was higher in children with neonatal transfer compared with those without neonatal transfer (communication: 6.5% vs 3.5%, OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.19-1.70; gross motor: 7.6% vs 4.0%, OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07-1.49; fine motor: 11.3% vs 7.1%, OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.03-1.36; problem solving: 10.8% vs 6.8%, OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.12-1.48; and personal-social: 6.2% vs 2.9%, OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.26-1.83).   Conclusion: Neonatal transfer was associated with a higher risk of neurodevelopmental impairment at 3 years of age. What is Known: • Neonatal transfer after birth in preterm infants is associated with adverse short-term outcomes. • Long-term outcomes of outborn infants with neonatal transfer in the general population remain unclear. What is New: • This study suggests that neonatal transfer at birth is associated with an increased risk of neurodevelopmental impairment. • Efforts for referring high-risk pregnant women to higher level centers may reduce the incidence of neonatal transfer, leading to improved neurological outcomes in the general population.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornJapanPregnancyInbornNeonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitationNeonatal transportOutbornPerinatal system

Identifiers

PMID35333975
PMCPMC9889501
OpenAlexW4220885361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.