ReviewAdvances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology2022
Microfluidics in Biotechnology: Overview and Status Quo.
Review in Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- An enzymatic microfluidic sensor for β-lactam antibiotics based on cross-linked ancestral β-lactamase crystals.Nanoscale advances · 2026Article
- Coupling Bacterial Cell Size Regulation with Clonal Proliferation Dynamics Reveals Cell Division Based on Surface Area.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of 3D-Printed Microfluidic Structures for Use in AML-Specific Biomarker Detection of PML::RARA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- A Thorough Review of Emerging Technologies in Micro- and Nanochannel Fabrication: Limitations, Applications, and Comparison.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Next generation microfluidics: fulfilling the promise of lab-on-a-chip technologies.Lab on a chip · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microfluidics has emerged as a powerful tool, enabling biotechnological processes to be performed on a microscale where certain physical processes (such as laminar flow, surface-to-volume ratio, and surface interactions) become dominant factors. At the same time, volumes and assay times are also reduced in microscale - which can substantially lower experimental costs. A decade ago, most microfluidic systems were only used for proof-of-concept studies; today, a wide array of microfluidic systems have been deployed to tackle various biotechnological research questions - especially regarding the analysis, screening, and understanding of cellular systems. Examples cover all biotechnological areas, from diagnostic applications in the field of medical biotechnology to the screening of potentially useful cells in the field of industrial biotechnology. As part of this review, we provide a brief introduction to microfluidics technology (including the vision of Lab-on-a-chip (LOC) systems) and survey some of the most notable applications of microfluidic technology in biotechnology to date.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35333948What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.