Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35333872›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

Assessing the best time interval between doses in a two-dose vaccination regimen to reduce the number of deaths in an ongoing epidemic of SARS-CoV-2.

Leonardo Souto Ferreira, Otavio Canton, Rafael Lopes Paixão da Silva, Silas Poloni, Vítor Sudbrack, Marcelo Eduardo Borges, Caroline Franco, Flavia Maria Darcie Marquitti, José Cássio de Moraes, Maria Amélia de Sousa Mascena Veras and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Leonardo Souto FerreiraInstituto de Física Teórica, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9023-0031
Otavio CantonInstituto de Física Teórica, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5167-705X
Rafael Lopes Paixão da SilvaInstituto de Física Teórica, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9416-6145
Silas PoloniInstituto de Física Teórica, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7707-8859
Vítor SudbrackInstituto de Física Teórica, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4815-2092
Marcelo Eduardo BorgesObservatório COVID-19 BR, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5807-3064
Caroline FrancoInstituto de Física Teórica, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8424-9396
Flavia Maria Darcie MarquittiObservatório COVID-19 BR, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0510-3992
José Cássio de MoraesObservatório COVID-19 BR, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Amélia de Sousa Mascena VerasObservatório COVID-19 BR, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1159-5762
Roberto André KraenkelInstituto de Física Teórica, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5602-5184
Renato Mendes CoutinhoObservatório COVID-19 BR, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2828-8558

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is a major concern all over the world and, as vaccines became available at the end of 2020, optimal vaccination strategies were subjected to intense investigation. Considering their critical role in reducing disease burden, the increasing demand outpacing production, and that most currently approved vaccines follow a two-dose regimen, the cost-effectiveness of delaying the second dose to increment the coverage of the population receiving the first dose is often debated. Finding the best solution is complex due to the trade-off between vaccinating more people with lower level of protection and guaranteeing higher protection to a fewer number of individuals. Here we present a novel extended age-structured SEIR mathematical model that includes a two-dose vaccination schedule with a between-doses delay modelled through delay differential equations and linear optimization of vaccination rates. By maintaining the minimum stock of vaccines under a given production rate, we evaluate the dose interval that minimizes the number of deaths. We found that the best strategy depends on an interplay between the vaccine production rate and the relative efficacy of the first dose. In the scenario of low first-dose efficacy, it is always better to vaccinate the second dose as soon as possible, while for high first-dose efficacy, the best strategy of time window depends on the production rate and also on second-dose efficacy provided by each type of vaccine. We also found that the rate of spread of the infection does not affect significantly the thresholds of the best window, but is an important factor in the absolute number of total deaths. These conclusions point to the need to carefully take into account both vaccine characteristics and roll-out speed to optimize the outcome of vaccination strategies.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID35333872
PMCPMC8986122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.