Correction: Estimating impact of food choices on life expectancy: A modeling study.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Perspective on the ethics of AI at the intersection of nutrition and behaviour change.Frontiers in aging · 2025
   Article
2. Digital Anti-Aging Healthcare: An Overview of the Applications of Digital Technologies in Diet Management.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024
   Review
3. [The potential of nutrition for pain management and planetary health].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
   Review
4. Study of the Effects of Physical-Activity Practice and Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet on Emotional Intelligence in Elementary School Education Students.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
   Article
5. Dietary Supplementation of Inulin Contributes to the Prevention of Estrogen Receptor-Negative Mammary Cancer by Alteration of Gut Microbial Communities and Epigenetic Regulations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  Estimating impact of food choices on life expectancy: A modeling study.2022

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract