Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35333702›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

A multicenter, single-blind, randomized, phase-2/3 study to evaluate immunogenicity and safety of a single intramuscular dose of biological E's Vi-capsular polysaccharide-CRM

Subhash Thuluva, Vikram Paradkar, Ramesh Matur, Kishore Turaga, Subba Reddy Gv

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Typhoid conjugate vaccines for preventing typhoid fever (enteric fever).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review on the Recent Advances on Typhoid Vaccine Development and Challenges Ahead.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Subhash ThuluvaClinical Development Department, Biological E Limited, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9099-420X
Vikram ParadkarClinical Development Department, Biological E Limited, Hyderabad, India.
Ramesh MaturClinical Development Department, Biological E Limited, Hyderabad, India.
Kishore TuragaClinical Development Department, Biological E Limited, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4197-9457
Subba Reddy GvClinical Development Department, Biological E Limited, Hyderabad, India.
Biological E (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current scenario of typhoid fever warrants early prevention with typhoid conjugate vaccines in susceptible populations to provide lifelong protection. We conducted a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, Phase 2/3 study to assess the immunogenicity and safety of Biological E's Typhoid Vi-CRM

Indexed as

Typhoid FeverTyphoid-Paratyphoid VaccinesAdultChildHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineInfantSingle-Blind MethodVaccines, ConjugateTyphoid-Paratyphoid VaccinesVaccines, Conjugateadultschildrenconjugate vaccineIndiainfantsintramuscularTyphiBEVTMTyphoid

Identifiers

PMID35333702
PMCPMC9196756
OpenAlexW4221031238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.