Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35333650›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Phylogenetic inference of where species spread or split across barriers.

Michael J Landis, Ignacio Quintero, Martha M Muñoz, Felipe Zapata, Michael J Donoghue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gene tree patterns help answer: vicariance or dispersal?bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The build-up of the present-day tropical diversity of tetrapods.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael J LandisDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130.ORCID 0000-0002-8672-6966
Ignacio QuinteroInstitut de Biologie, École Normale Supérieure, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3844-0805
Martha M MuñozDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520.ORCID 0000-0001-8297-2396
Felipe ZapataDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.ORCID 0000-0002-9386-0573
Michael J DonoghueDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520.ORCID 0000-0002-2151-4831

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SignificanceGeography molds how species evolve in space. Strong geographical barriers to movement, for instance, both inhibit dispersal between regions and allow isolated populations to diverge as new species. Weak barriers, by contrast, permit species range expansion and persistence. These factors present a conundrum: How strong must a barrier be before between-region speciation outpaces dispersal? We designed a phylogenetic model of dispersal, extinction, and speciation that allows regional features to influence rates of biogeographic change and applied it to the neotropical radiation of

Indexed as

LizardsAnimalsBiological EvolutionGenetic SpeciationGeographyPhylogenyPhylogeographybiogeographydispersalphylogeneticsspeciationstatistical inference

Identifiers

PMID35333650
PMCPMC9060446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.