Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35333507›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2022

High-Spin (

Shuyang Zhang, Maren Pink, Tobias Junghoefer, Wenchao Zhao, Sheng-Ning Hsu, Suchada Rajca, Arrigo Calzolari, Bryan W Boudouris, Maria Benedetta Casu, Andrzej Rajca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Unsymmetrical β-Fused Blatter Radical Zinc Phthalocyanines.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Thermally UltrarobustJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. High-SpinJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shuyang ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0304, United States.
Maren PinkIUMSC, Department of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405-7102, United States.
Tobias JunghoeferInstitute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Suchada RajcaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0304, United States.
Arrigo CalzolariCNR-NANO Istituto Nanoscienze, Centro S3, I-41125 Modena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0244-7717
Bryan W BoudourisORCID 0000-0003-0428-631X
Maria Benedetta CasuInstitute of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5659-7040
Andrzej RajcaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0304, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8856-1536

Funding

New Nitroxide Spin Labels for Distance Measurements in Biological SystemsR01GM124310 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI RAJCA, ANDRZEJ · 2017 to 2020
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triplet ground-state organic molecules are of interest with respect to several emerging technologies but usually show limited stability, especially as thin films. We report an organic diradical, consisting of two Blatter radicals, that possesses a triplet ground state with a singlet-triplet energy gap, Δ

Indexed as

ElectronsElectric ConductivityElectron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularMolecular Conformation

Identifiers

PMID35333507
PMCPMC10439714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.