Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35333502›Full record

ReviewCancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)

Clinical Evidence Generation During a Pandemic: Lessons Learned for Sustaining Progress.

Donna R Rivera, Paul G Kluetz, Kald Abdallah, Sundeep Agrawal, Derek C Angus, Robert M Califf, Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, Randall Hyer, Douglas R Lowy, Samir N Khleif

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Donna R RiveraFrom the Oncology Center of Excellence, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
Paul G KluetzFrom the Oncology Center of Excellence, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
Kald AbdallahMedical Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb.
Sundeep AgrawalFrom the Oncology Center of Excellence, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
Derek C AngusUPMC and University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Robert M CaliffVerily Life Sciences and Google Health, South San Francisco, CA.
Elizabeth Garrett-MayerCenter for Research and Analytics, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.
Randall HyerModerna, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
Douglas R LowyOffice of the Director, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Samir N KhleifGeorgetown University Medical School, Washington, DC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractBecause of significant adaptations forced by the COVID-19 pandemic, resultant changes within health care delivery and clinical research introduced the potential for evaluation of novel evidence generation approaches in oncology. On July 26 and 27, 2021, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, National Cancer Policy Forum hosted a virtual workshop entitled "Cancer Care and Cancer Research in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Workshop on Lessons Learned." This workshop examined changes in cancer care and cancer research that occurred in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and considered lessons learned from that experience. The goal was to identify what changes could improve the delivery of high-quality cancer care and the conduct of cancer clinical trials in the postpandemic era, with an emphasis on health equity. How can we sustain the valuable lessons learned that might accelerate progress and enhance clinical evidence generation for patients and clinicians? In this overview, we discuss ways in which the COVID-19 experience has catalyzed research efficiencies as well as fostered a broader array of trial design and research methods that may facilitate improved cancer drug development during the pandemic and beyond.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsHumansMedical OncologyPandemics

Identifiers

PMID35333502
PMCPMC9158733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.