Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35333364›Full record

Observational studyJAMA network open2022

Association of Habitual Alcohol Intake With Risk of Cardiovascular Disease.

Kiran J Biddinger, Connor A Emdin, Mary E Haas, Minxian Wang, George Hindy, Patrick T Ellinor, Sekar Kathiresan, Amit V Khera, Krishna G Aragam

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 236 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
236citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
57.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

236 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 413 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

176 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kiran J BiddingerProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Connor A EmdinProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Mary E HaasProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Minxian WangProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
George HindyProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Patrick T EllinorProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Sekar KathiresanProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Amit V KheraProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Krishna G AragamProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USBroad Institute · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Center for Common Disease GeneticsUM1HG008895 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI DALY, MARK JOSEPH, GABRIEL, STACEY · 2016 to 2020
$111.2M
Polygenic prediction of common, complex diseasesK08HG010155 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KHERA, AMIT VIKRAM · 2018 to 2021
$1.1M
Population Assessments of Aggregate Genetic Risk for DilatedýCardiomyopathyK08HL153937 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ARAGAM, KRISHNA G · 2021 to 2025
$846k
Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853NHGRI NIH HHS K08 HG010155NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG008895NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL153937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Observational studies have consistently proposed cardiovascular benefits associated with light alcohol consumption, while recent genetic analyses (ie, mendelian randomization studies) have suggested a possible causal link between alcohol intake and increased risk of cardiovascular disease. However, traditional approaches to genetic epidemiology assume a linear association and thus have not fully evaluated dose-response estimates of risk across different levels of alcohol intake. Objectives: To assess the association of habitual alcohol intake with cardiovascular disease risk and to evaluate the direction and relative magnitude of cardiovascular risk associated with different amounts of alcohol consumption. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used the UK Biobank (2006-2010, follow-up until 2016) to examine confounding in epidemiologic associations between alcohol intake and cardiovascular diseases. Using both traditional (ie, linear) and nonlinear mendelian randomization, potential associations between alcohol consumption and cardiovascular diseases (eg, hypertension and coronary artery disease) as well as corresponding association shapes were assessed. Data analysis was conducted from July 2019 to January 2022. Exposures: Genetic predisposition to alcohol intake. Main Outcomes and Measures: The association between alcohol consumption and cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. Results: This study included 371 463 participants (mean [SD] age, 57.0 [7.9] years; 172 400 [46%] men), who consumed a mean (SD) 9.2 (10.6) standard drinks per week. Overall, 121 708 participants (33%) had hypertension. Light to moderate alcohol consumption was associated with healthier lifestyle factors, adjustment for which attenuated the cardioprotective epidemiologic associations with modest intake. In linear mendelian randomization analyses, a 1-SD increase in genetically predicted alcohol consumption was associated with 1.3-fold (95% CI, 1.2-1.4) higher risk of hypertension (P < .001) and 1.4-fold (95% CI, 1.1-1.8) higher risk of coronary artery disease (P = .006). Nonlinear mendelian randomization analyses suggested nonlinear associations between alcohol consumption and both hypertension and coronary artery disease: light alcohol intake was associated with minimal increases in cardiovascular risk, whereas heavier consumption was associated with exponential increases in risk of both clinical and subclinical cardiovascular disease. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, coincident, favorable lifestyle factors attenuated the observational benefits of modest alcohol intake. Genetic epidemiology suggested that alcohol consumption of all amounts was associated with increased cardiovascular risk, but marked risk differences exist across levels of intake, including those accepted by current national guidelines.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCoronary Artery DiseaseHypertensionAlcohol DrinkingCohort StudiesHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID35333364
PMCPMC8956974
OpenAlexW4220854628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.