Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35333359›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Association of Remote History of Venous Thrombosis With Risk of Venous Thrombosis After Age 70 Years.

Huijie Wang, Mary Cushman, Frits R Rosendaal, Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Huijie WangLeiden University Medical Center, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Mary CushmanDepartment of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington.
Frits R RosendaalLeiden University Medical Center, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Astrid van Hylckama VliegLeiden University Medical Center, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Previous venous thrombosis (VT) is associated with risk of future VT, but quantification of risk over the life course is poorly understood. More information is needed for clinicians to understand the association of remote history of VT with the risk of VT in older patients. Objective: To assess the association between a remote history of VT and the development of VT in older age. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Age and Thrombosis, Acquired and Genetic Risk Factors in the Elderly case-control study enrolled patients 70 years and older with VT and control individuals 70 years and older without VT between June 2008 and August 2011. The Age and Thrombosis, Acquired and Genetic Risk Factors in the Elderly study is a 2-center, population-based case-control study that was conducted in Burlington, Vermont, in the US and in Leiden, the Netherlands. Consecutively diagnosed patients with an objectively proven episode of VT (deep vein thrombosis of the leg or pulmonary embolism) were included. Control individuals were identified in the same geographic areas as the patients and were randomly selected. Data were analyzed between May 2021 and October 2021. Exposures: Self-reported remote VT (occurring >10 years before to enrollment). Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the risk of VT at older age. The association of self-reported history of remote VT with VT at older age was assessed by calculating odds ratios (ORs) as estimates of relative risk with 95% CIs. Results: A total of 460 patients with VT and 456 control participants were included. There were slightly more women than men in both groups (60.2% of patients [n = 277] were women and 52.4% of control participants [n = 239] were women), and the mean (range) age of patients was 78.7 (70.0-100.9) years, which was similar to the control participants. Compared with individuals without remote VT, those with a remote history of VT had an increased risk of VT (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.56-4.13). The crude risk estimate was robust to adjustment and time since remote VT, that is, individuals with a VT 10 to 30 years ago (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.34-5.57) and those with a VT more than 30 years ago (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.21-4.84) had a an increased risk of VT. The population-attributable fraction of a remote history of VT was 7.7%. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, a remote history of VT was associated with risk of VT in older individuals. This quantification could assist clinicians in advising patients on VT prevention.

Indexed as

Venous ThrombosisAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID35333359
PMCPMC8956975
OpenAlexW4221123653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.