Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35332965›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2022

Scoping the psychological support practices of Australian health professionals working with people with primary brain tumor and their families.

Tamara Ownsworth, Katarzyna Lion, Ursula M Sansom-Daly, Kerryn Pike, Eng-Siew Koh, Georgia K B Halkett, Mark B Pinkham, Raymond J Chan, Haryana M Dhillon, BRAINS Program Investigators

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Self- and informant-reported cognitive concerns associated with primary brain tumour: systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Tamara OwnsworthSchool of Applied Psychology & The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1835-7094
Katarzyna LionSchool of Applied Psychology & The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3699-6896
Ursula M Sansom-DalySchool of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4200-8900
Kerryn PikeSchool of Psychology & Public Health & John Richards Centre for Rural Ageing Research La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.
Eng-Siew KohSouth Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Faculty of Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Georgia K B HalkettCurtin School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4065-4044
Mark B PinkhamSchool of Medicine, University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
Raymond J ChanCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Haryana M DhillonSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4039-5169
BRAINS Program Investigators
Griffith University · AUUNSW Sydney · AUCurtin University · AUFlinders University · AULa Trobe University · AUThe University of Queensland · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to scope the psychological support practices of Australian health professionals providing supportive care to adults with primary brain tumor.

methodHealth professionals from multidisciplinary organizations and cancer support services completed an online survey focused on psychological support for people with brain tumor (PwBT) and family members, and perceived barriers or gaps in support provision.

results107 professionals, mainly from psychology (45%), nursing (20%), and social work (10%) backgrounds, completed the survey. Scope of practice differed according to discipline, with psychologists and nurses most likely to screen for psychological distress (71%-76%), and psychologists more typically providing at least one psychological support session (78%). Psychologists were more likely to screen for cognitive impairment (31%), whereas nurses and social workers more commonly provided family-based support (62%-73%). Psychological support was more frequently provided in the long-term management phase (78%) than early post-diagnosis/treatment (45%). System-level barriers to accessing psychological support were most frequently identified, which included limited resources and funding, insufficient staff time, lengthy waitlists and costs, poor service coordination, and lack of staff with brain tumor-specific training.

conclusionsThe provision of psychological support for PwBT varies according to discipline, setting and management phase. Further research on different models of psychosocial care is needed to inform strategies to address organizational and policy factors impacting professionals' scope of practice.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsHealth PersonnelAdultAustraliaFamilyHumansSocial Workersbrain tumorcancerhealth professionalspsycho-oncologypsychosocial support

Identifiers

PMID35332965
PMCPMC9543201
OpenAlexW4221043701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.